Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Darshak Jeetendra Rajgor vs Periyar University & on 18 November, 2013

Author: K.M.Thaker

Bench: K.M.Thaker

  
	 
	 DARSHAK JEETENDRA RAJGOR....Petitioner(s)V/SPERIYAR UNIVERSITY
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	

 
 


	 


	C/SCA/7331/2013
	                                                                    
	                           ORDER

 

 


 
	  
	  
		 
			 

IN
			THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
		
	

 


 


 


SPECIAL CIVIL
APPLICATION  NO. 7331 of 2013
 


 


 

================================================================
 


DARSHAK JEETENDRA
RAJGOR....Petitioner(s)
 


Versus
 


PERIYAR UNIVERSITY  & 
2....Respondent(s)
 

================================================================
 

Appearance:
 

MR
GM JOSHI, ADVOCATE for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
 

NOTICE
UNSERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 3
 

SERVED
BY RPAD - (N) for the Respondent(s) No. 1 - 2
 

================================================================
 

 


 


	 
		  
		 
		  
			 
				 

CORAM:
				
				
			
			 
				 

HONOURABLE
				MR.JUSTICE K.M.THAKER
			
		
	

 


 

 


Date : 18/11/2013
 


 

 


ORAL ORDER

1. Heard Mr. Keyur Acharya, learned advocate for Mr. G.M. Joshi, learned advocate for the petitioner.

2. In present petition, the petitioner has prayed that:-

7(A) This Honourable Court be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction in the form of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondent No.1 to issue the Degree Certificate of the course of Bachelor of Arts completed by the petitioner forthwith.
(B).....
(C)......

3. Today, at the time of hearing Mr. Keyur Acharya, learned advocate for Mr. G.M. Joshi, learned advocate for the petitioner submitted that after the petitioner filed present petition, recently the petitioner has been informed that the Degree Certificate of the petitioner will be sent to him after convocation is over.

3.1 In view of the intimation given by the respondent to the petitioner, it appears that there is no justification on part of the petitioner to continue to harbour any apprehension that certificate will not be issued. Furthermore, in view of the communication received by the petitioner intimating the reply as regards petitioner's anxiety for Degree Certificate, it appears that there is no need to continue to maintain present petition.

3.2 Therefore, while disposing of the petition at this stage, it is clarified that it is only in view of the reply said to have been received by the petitioner from the respondents that the petition is not continued at this stage.

3.3 It is also clarified that if the petitioner does not receive the Degree Certificate on or before 30.11.2013, it will be open to the petitioner to file appropriate application for revival of present petition. It will also be open to the petitioner to serve a copy of present order to the respondent.

With the aforesaid clarifications, present petition is disposed of at this stage.

(K.M.THAKER, J.) Suresh* 3