Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Kashi Ram vs State Of Haryana And Others on 30 April, 2024

                                       Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:059368

                                                                 2024:PHHC:059368




             IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
                         AT CHANDIGARH
255
                                       CWP-7511-2023 (O&M)
                                       Date of decision: 30.04.2024

Kashi Ram
                                                                      ...Petitioner

                                   VERSUS

State of Haryana and others

                                                                    ...Respondents



CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ

Present :-    Mr. Mukesh Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner.

              Mr. Vivek Chauhan, Addl. A.G. Haryana.

                *****

VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral)

The instant petition has been preferred by the petitioner seeking issuance of an appropriate writ especially in the nature of Mandamus directing the official respondents to register the family member of the petitioner in Parivar Pehchan Patar as per the Haryana Parivar Pehchan Act, 2021.

After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner contends that espousing his grievance, the petitioner has sent a representation dated 19.12.2022 (Annexure P-6) to respondent No.3 i.e. Additional District Commissioner, Mahendergarh and he would be satisfied in case he is directed to look into the aforesaid representation of the petitioner and the grievance espoused by the petitioner therein and a 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 02-05-2024 03:07:39 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:059368 2 255 CWP-7511-2023 (O&M) speaking order is passed thereupon in accordance with law and in a time bound manner.

Notice of motion.

Mr. Vivek Chauhan, Addl. A.G. Haryana, submits that he has no objection to the aforesaid prayer being granted.

The present petition is accordingly disposed of without commenting on the merits of the present case and with a direction to respondent No.3- Additional District Commissioner, Mahendergarh at Narnaul, to take note of the representation dated 19.12.2022 (Annexure P-6) sent by the petitioner and to pass a well reasoned and speaking order thereupon after granting an opportunity of hearing to the respective parties in accordance with law and preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.




                                                 (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ)
30.04.2024                                               JUDGE
Mangal Singh

         Whether speaking/reasoned :     Yes/No
         Whether reportable        :     Yes/No




                                        2 of 2
                     ::: Downloaded on - 02-05-2024 03:07:40 :::