Chattisgarh High Court
Hemlata Verma vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 16 September, 2022
Author: Narendra Kumar Vyas
Bench: Narendra Kumar Vyas
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
W.P.(S) No. 4773 of 2022
Hemlata Verma D/o Late Narayan Prasad Verma Aged About 44 Years
R/o Balaji Vihar Colony, Street No. 4, Bajrang Chowk, Mathpara, Raipur,
District Raipur, Chhattisgarh
-----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Higher
Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur,
District Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2. Commissioner Directorate Of Higher Education, Block 2nd And 3rd
Floor, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Post Office And Police Station
Nava Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh
3. Joint Director Directorate Of Higher Education, Block 2nd And 3rd Floor,
Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Post Office And Police Station Nava
Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh
4. Principal Govt. Koduram Dalit College, Nawagarh, District Bemetara,
Chhattisgarh
----Respondents
& W.P.(S) No. 4896 of 2022 Satayavrat Mishra S/o Girdhari Mishra Aged About 30 Years Resident Of Kripa Bhawan, Opposite Forest Office, Beside Mahindra Showroom, Kobia, Bemetara, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh.
-----Petitioner Vs.
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary, Women And Child Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
2. District Program Officer, Women And Child Development Department, Bemetara District Bemetara Chhattisgarh
----Respondents Cause Title is taken from CIS System For Petitioners : Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate. For Respondents/State : Shri Suyash Dhar, P.L. Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 16.09.2022
1. The petitioner in these petitions has challenged the validity of the policy. This issue has already been considered and decided by the -2- Hon'ble Division Bench in W.P.(S) No. 6689/2018 order dated 06/09/2022 and other connected cases, wherein the Hon'ble Division Bench has held that when one of the family member of the deceased (employee) is in Government Service then dependent is not entitled to get compassionate appointment.
2. In view of the judgment passed by Hon'ble Division Bench of this High Court, these writ petitions are dismissed.
Sd/-
(Narendra kumar Vyas) Judge