Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 3]

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Chennai

Amaravathi Sri Venkatesa Paper Mills ... vs Dcit, Tiruppur on 14 March, 2017

                 आयकर अपील य अ धकरण, 'ए'  यायपीठ, चे नई
 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , 'A' BENCH, CHENNAI
   ी ए. मोहन अलंकामणी, लेखा सद य एवं  ी जी. पवन कुमार,  या#यक सद य के सम$
        BEFORE SHRI A.MOHAN ALANKAMONY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
             AND SHRI G. PAVAN KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER

                 आयकरअपीलसं./I.T. A. No.3113/Mds/2016
                ( नधा रणवष  / Assessment Year: 2006-07)
   M/s. Amaravathi Sri Venkatesa Vs The Deputy Commissioner                     of
   Paper Mills Limited,                     Income Tax,
   Palani Road, Madathukulam,               Circle-2,
   Tirupur Dist. - 642 113                  Tirupur - 642 113.

   PAN: AABCA6616L
   (अपीलाथ /Appellant)                                (  यथ /Respondent)


    अपीलाथ क ओरसे/ Appellant by                   : None
      यथ क ओरसे/Respondent by                     : Shri Shiva Srinivas, JCIT


    सन
     ु वाईक तार ख/Da t e of h e ar in g           :     14.03.2017
    घोषणाक तार ख /D at e of Pr on o unc em en t   :     14.03.2017


                                     आदे श / O R D E R

Per A. Mohan Alankamony, AM:-

This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Coimbatore dated 22.08.2016 in IT Appeal No.191/15-16 for the assessment year 2006-07.

2. In this appeal, notice of hearing was sent to the assessee by Registered Post with Acknowledgement Card intimating the assessee that the appeal is fixed for hearing on 14.03.2017. The 2 ITA No.3113/Mds/2016 notice was served to the assessee on 14.02.2017. However, on 14.03.2017, none appeared on behalf of the assessee, nor any request for adjournment was received.

3. In view of the above, we are of the considered opinion that the assessee is not interested in pursuing the appeal filed before this Tribunal. Hence, following the decision of the Delhi Bench in the case of CIT v. Multiplan India P. Ltd., reported in 38 ITD 320 and the judgment of the Hon'ble Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Late Tukojirao Holkar (223 ITR 480), we dismiss the appeal in limine.

4. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed.

Order pronounced in the open court on the 14th March, 2017.

                  Sd/-                                        Sd/-
              (जी. पवन कु मार)                        (ए. मोहन अलंकामणी)
          (G. Pavan Kumar)                         (A. Mohan Alankamony)
      याियक सद य/Judicial Member                लेखा सद य/Accountant Member

चे#नई/Chennai,
$दनांक/Dated 14th March, 2017

JR

आदे श क    त'ल(प अ)े(षत/Copy to:

1. अपीलाथ /Appellant      2.   यथ /Respondent         3. आयकर आय,
                                                                ु त (अपील)/CIT(A)
4. आयकर आय,
          ु त/CIT         5. (वभागीय   त न/ध/DR       6. गाड  फाईल/GF