Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 10]

Chattisgarh High Court

Raj Narayan Sahu vs State Of Chhattisgarh 35 ... on 5 December, 2018

Author: Sanjay K. Agrawal

Bench: Sanjay K. Agrawal

                                                      1

                                                                                      NAFR

                          HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                                         MCC No. 449 of 2018

                   Raj Narayan Sahu, aged about 45 years, S/o Shri Sundarlal Sahu,
                   Businessman, R/o Baloda Bazar, Police Station Baloda Bazar, Tahsil
                   Bloda Bazar, District Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara (earlier District Raipur),
                   Chhattisgarh.                                ---- Applicant

                                               Versus

                1. State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Ministry of Home,
                   Secretariat, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

                2. Superintendent of Police, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

                3. Station House Officer, Police Station Baloda Bazar, Tahsil Baloda
                   Bazar, District Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara (earlier District Raipur)
                   Chhattisgarh.                                ---- Respondents

For Applicant : Mr. C. D. Sharma, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 05/12/18

1. This MCC has been filed by the applicant for restoration of Writ Petition No. 3300 of 2003 which was dismissed by the Court for want of prosecution on 04.04.2017.

2. On due consideration of the submissions of the learned counsel for the applicant and the reasons mentioned in the restoration petition, I am satisfied that the absence of the applicant's counsel on 04.04.2017, when the Writ Petition No. 3300 of 2003 was taken up for hearing, was based on bonafide grounds.

3. Accordingly, the M.C.C. No. 449 of 2018 is allowed and the Writ Petition No. 3300 of 2003 is restored to its original number for hearing and disposal in accordance with law.

SD/-

(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka