Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

Masud Iftikar Alam vs The Tezpur University And 7 Ors on 7 February, 2019

Author: Manojit Bhuyan

Bench: Manojit Bhuyan

                                                                    Page No.# 1/8

GAHC010021602018




                       THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                           Case No. : WP(C) 597/2018

         1:MASUD IFTIKAR ALAM
         S/O- MD. MANIRUL HOQUE, PERMANENT R/O- MOTHER TERESA PATH, H
         NO. 02, NEAR HATIGAON P.S, GUWAHATI-781038, DIST- KAMRUP(M),
         ASSAM

         VERSUS

         1:THE TEZPUR UNIVERSITY AND 7 ORS.
         REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR, TEZPUR, DIST- SONITPUR, ASSAM, PIN- 784028


         2:THE VICE CHANCELLOR
         TEZPUR UNIVERSITY
          P.O- TEZPUR UNIVERSITY NAPAAM
          DIST- SONITPUR
         ASSAM
          PIN- 784028


         3:THE REGISTRAR
         TEZPUR UNIVERSITY
          P.O- TEZPUR UNIVERSITY NAPAAM
          DIST- SONITPUR
         ASSAM
          PIN- 784028


         4:THE DEAN STUDENTS WELFARE
         TEZPUR UNIVERSITY
          P.O- TEZPUR UNIVERSITY NAPAAM
          DIST- SONITPUR
         ASSAM
          PIN- 784028
                                                            Page No.# 2/8


            5:THE ENQUIRY COMMITTEE
            TEZPUR UNIVERSITY
             REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN AT TEZPUR UNIVERSITY
             P.O- TEZPUR UNIVERSITY NAPAAM
             DIST- SONITPUR
            ASSAM
             PIN- 784028


            6:THE STUDENTS DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE
             REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN
            TEZPUR UNIVERSITY
             P.O- TEZPUR UNIVERSITY NAPAAM
             DIST- SONITPUR
            ASSAM
             PIN- 784028


            7:THE DEAN SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING
            TEZPUR UNIVERSITY
             P.O- TEZPUR UNIVERSITY NAPAAM
             DIST- SONITPUR
            ASSAM
             PIN- 784028


            8:THE HOSTEL WARDEN OF CHARAIDEO MENS HOSTEL
            TEZPUR UNIVERSITY
             P.O- TEZPUR UNIVERSITY NAPAAM
             DIST- SONITPUR
            ASSAM
             PIN- 78402

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR. P K GOSWAMI

Advocate for the Respondent : SC, TEZPUR UNIVERSITY




             Linked Case : WP(C) 595/2018

            1:SHUBHAM PANDEY
             S/O- SRI SATISH KUMAR PANDEY
             PERMANENT R/O- 180
                                             Page No.# 3/8

MALIPUR MACHHALISAHAR PADAV
OLANGANJ
JAUNPUR
UP(E)
PIN- 222002


VERSUS

1:THE TEZPUR UNIVERSITY AND 7 ORS.
REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR
TEZPUR
DIST- SONITPUR
ASSAM
PIN- 784028

2:THE VICE CHANCELLOR
TEZPUR UNIVERSITY
P.O- TEZPUR UNIVERSITY NAPAAM
DIST- SONITPUR
ASSAM
PIN- 784028

3:THE REGISTRAR
TEZPUR UNIVERSITY
P.O- TEZPUR UNIVERSITY NAPAAM
DIST- SONITPUR
ASSAM
PIN- 784028

4:THE DEAN
STUDENTS WELFARE
TEZPUR UNIVERSITY
P.O- TEZPUR UNIVERSITY NAPAAM
DIST- TEZPUR
ASSAM
PIN- 784028

5:THE INQUIRY COMMITTEE
TEZPUR UNIVERSITY
REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN AT TEZPUR UNIVERSITY
P.O- TEZPUR UNIVERSITY NAPAAM
DIST- SONITPUR
ASSAM
PIN- 784028

6:THE STUDENTS DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE
TEZPUR UNIVERSITY
                                                    Page No.# 4/8

REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN AT TEZPUR UNIVERSITY NAPAAM
DIST- SONITPUR
ASSAM
PIN- 784028

7:THE DEAN
SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING
TEZPUR UNIVERSITY
P.O- TEZPUR UNIVERSITY
P.O- TEZPUR UNIVERSITY NAPAAM
DIST- SONITPUR
ASSAM
PIN- 784028

8:THE HOSTEL WARDEN OF PATKAI MENS HOSTEL
TEZPUR UNIVERSITY
P.O- TEZPUR UNIVERSITY NAPAAM
DIST- SONITPUR
ASSAM
PIN- 784028

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P K GOSWAMI
Advocate for the Respondent : SC
TEZPUR UNIVERSITY



Linked Case : WP(C) 831/2018

1:CHANDEEP SUMON GOGOI
 S/O. LATE MINARAM GOGOI
 PERMANENT RESIDENT OF LAKHIMI NAGAR NO. 1
 PULIBOR
 JORHAT
 P.O. R.R.L.
 PIN-785006
 DIST. JORHAT
ASSAM.


VERSUS

1:THE TEZPUR UNIVERSITY AND ORS
REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR
TEZPUR
DIST. SONITPUR
ASSAM
PIN-784028
                                        Page No.# 5/8


2:THE VICE CHANCELLOR
TEZPUR UNIVERSITY
P.O. TEZPUR UNIVERSITY NAPAAM
DIST. SONITPUR
ASSAM
PIN-784028

3:THE REGISTRAR
TEZPUR UNIVERSITY
P.O. TEZPUR UNIVERSITY NAPAAM
DIST. SONITPUR
ASSAM
PIN-784028

4:THE DEAN
STUDENT'S WELFARE
TEZPUR UNIVERSITY
P.O. TEZPUR UNIVERSITYU NAPAAM
DIST. TEZPUR
ASSAM
PIN-784028.

5:THE INQUIRY COMMITTEE
TEZPUR UNIVERSITY
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN
AT TEZPUR UNIVERISITY
P.O. TEZPUR UNIVERSITY NAPAAM
DIST. SONITPUR
ASSAM
PIN-784028

6:THE STUDENT DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE
TEZPUR UNIVERSITY
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN
AT TEZPUR UNIVERSITY NAPAAM
DIST. SONITPUR
ASSAM
PIN-784028

7:THE DEAN
SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING
TEZPUR UNIVERSITY
P.O. TEZPUR UNIVERSITY NAPAAM
DIST. SONITPUR
ASSAM
PIN-784028
                                                                            Page No.# 6/8

            8:THE HOSTEL WARDEN OF PATKAI MEN'S HOSTEL
            TEZPUR UNIVERSITY
            P.O. TEZPUR UNIVERSITY NAPAAM
            DIST. SONITPUR
            ASSAM
            PIN-784028.

            Advocate for the Petitioner : MISS. M BORAH
            Advocate for the Respondent : SC
            TU



                                  BEFORE
                   HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJIT BHUYAN

                                          ORDER

07.02.2019 Heard Ms. M. Borah, learned counsel for the petitioner in the three respective writ petitions as well as Mr. N.C. Das, learned senior counsel representing the Tezpur University, assisted by Mr. A. Das, Advocate.

For an incident occurring in the campus of the University on 06.11.2017, disciplinary actions were taken against the petitioners by rusticating them for two semesters which, however, were reduced to rustication only for the Spring semester of 2018 by office order dated 09.01.2018, followed by order dated 01.02.2018.

At the motion stage the basic facts were looked into, together with the provisions relating to the procedure for rustication governed under the Regulations on Maintenance of Students' Discipline and while issuing notice on 07.02.2018 in WP(C) 597/2018 allowed the petitioner therein to pursue his education and to appear in the examination. He was also allowed to participate in the campus placement. However, this Court made it clear that the petitioner would remain under conduct probation until he completes his study at the Tezpur University. The order passed in WP(C) 597/2018 was reiterated in the other two writ petitions as well.

Page No.# 7/8 As on today all the three writ petitioners have completed their study at the Tezpur University. Despite the same, it is contended that they have not been able to pursue their future career as because the necessary certificates have not yet been furnished by the Tezpur University such certificates being (i) Final Pass Certificate, (ii) Transcript Certificate/Marksheet, (iii) Migration Certificate, and (iv) Character Certificate.

Mr. Das, learned senior counsel fairly submits that since by now all the petitioners have completed their study, the University has no intention to hold back the Certificates of the petitioners. He submits that if and when representation to that effect is made to the Vice Chancellor of the University, the same would be favourably looked into and appropriate orders would be passed for redressing the grievances of the petitioners.

Having regard to the above and as agreed to by the counsels for the parties, this Court would not like to delve into other issues connected with the cases, save and except directing the petitioners to make individual representation to the Vice Chancellor of Tezpur University with prayer for furnishing the Certificates that are required to be supplied to them for advancement of their future career. As and when representation is made in terms of the above, the Vice Chancellor of Tezpur University would consider the same and pass necessary orders within a period of 2 (two) weeks thereof.

Ms. M. Borah on instructions from her clients submits that necessary representation would be made within 1 (one) week from today.

In view of the above and the broad consensus arrived at by and between the parties, the writ petitions do not survive for further consideration and the same are disposed of accordingly.

JUDGE Page No.# 8/8 Comparing Assistant