Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Bombay High Court

Aquino S/O. Avith Martis (C-5118) vs The State Of Maharashtra Through D I G ... on 5 February, 2020

Author: T.V. Nalawade

Bench: T.V. Nalawade, M.G. Sewlikar

                                         1    Cr WP 188 of 2020

      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                 BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                  Criminal Writ Petition No.188 of 2020

     *       Aquino s/o Avith Martis (C-5118),
             Age Major, Occupation :Convict,
             R/o 601/B, Rashmi Tenmey,
             A-wing, Eden Rose Complex,
             Bervali Park, Mira Road,
             Thane (East), Mumbai
             At present confined in
             Open Prison, Paithan.        .. Petitioner.

                      Versus

     1)      The State of Maharashtra
             Through D.I.G. Prisons,
             Aurangabad.

     2)      The State of Maharashtra,
             Through Superintendent,
             Open Prison, Paithan.             .. Respondents.

                                ----
     Shri. Rupesh A. Jaiswal, Advocate, for petitioner.
     Shri. K.D. Munde, Additional Public Prosecutor, for
     respondents.
                                ----

                               Coram:   T.V. NALAWADE &
                                        M.G. SEWLIKAR, JJ.

                               Date:    05 FEBRUARY 2020

     ORAL JUDGMENT (Per T.V. Nalawade, J.):

1) Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard both the sides by consent for final disposal. ::: Uploaded on - 07/02/2020 ::: Downloaded on - 07/02/2020 23:23:12 :::

2 Cr WP 188 of 2020

2) The present proceeding is filed to challenge the order made by the respondents by which furlough leave is grated but with onerous conditions.

3) The submissions made and the record show that, the petitioner is life convict and is kept in Open Prison Paithan and he has undergone 11 years of actual imprisonment. The submissions made show that in the year 2018 he was released on parole and he had turned up to jail in time. It was submitted for the petitioner that the petitioner is not in a position to give two sureties. Submission was made that if cash security is obtained the petitioner can come out of jail.

4) Considering the circumstance that the petitioner is kept in open prison and in the past he returned to jail in time this Court holds that the aforesaid conditions are onerous and by asking the petitioner to give cash security of Rs.7,000/- he can be released on furlough leave. In the result, following order. ::: Uploaded on - 07/02/2020 ::: Downloaded on - 07/02/2020 23:23:12 :::

3 Cr WP 188 of 2020

5) The petition is allowed. The petitioner is to be released on furlough leave on depositing cash of Rs.7,000/- (Rupees Seven Thousand Only) as cash security with other usual terms and conditions. To that extent the order made by the authority is modified. The order is to be complied with within 15 days. Rule made absolute in the above terms.

                   Sd/-                                             Sd/-
     (M.G. SEWLIKAR, J.)                               (T.V. NALAWADE, J.)




     rsl




::: Uploaded on - 07/02/2020                       ::: Downloaded on - 07/02/2020 23:23:12 :::