Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

M/S Sharma Travels vs The Regional Provident Fund ... on 12 September, 2024

Author: M.G.S. Kamal

Bench: M.G.S. Kamal

                                             -1-
                                                     NC: 2024:KHC:37436
                                                   WP No.24586 of 2024




                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
                   DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024
                                        BEFORE
                       THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL
                      WRIT PETITION NO.24586 OF 2024 (L-PF)


               BETWEEN:

               M/S SHARMA TRAVELS
               AN UNREGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM
               446, 8TH MAIN, 3RD BLOCK
               OPP. SEVA SADAN INSTITUTE
               KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560034.

               REP. BY ITS PARTNER
Digitally
signed by      SRI. T. RAJENDRA KUMAR SHARMA
SUMA B N       S/O SRI. P. TEJRAJ SHARMA
Location:      AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS.
High Court
of Karnataka
                                                          ...PETITIONER
               (BY SMT. SUMADEVI M.V. ADV., FOR
                    SRI. SATISH G.A. ADV.,)

               AND:

               THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER-II
               EMPLOYEES' PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION
               REGIONAL OFFICE (KORAMANGALA)
               ANNAPURNESHWARI COMPLEX
               SURVEY NO.37/1, 6TH MAIN
               SINGASANDRA, HOSUR MAIN ROAD
               BENGALURU-560068.

                                                         ...RESPONDENT
               (BY SRI. M. PRADEEP, ADV.,)
                               -2-
                                          NC: 2024:KHC:37436
                                        WP No.24586 of 2024




     THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT
THE RESPONDENT AUTHORITY NOT TO INITIATE ANY
COERCIVE STEPS IN EXECUTING AND IMPLEMENTING SEC. 7-Q
AND SEC 14-B ORDERS DTD. 19.02.2024 LEVYING INTEREST
AND DAMAGES AS PER ANNX-A AND B AND SEC 8F ORDER OF
ATTACHMENT DTD. 21.08.2024 AS PER ANNX-I TILL THE
DISPOSAL OF THE STATUTORY APPEAL FILED BEFORE EPFAT,
BENGALURU IN APPEAL NO. EPF 38/2024 9AS PER ANNX-G) &
ETC.

    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL

                        ORAL ORDER

Sri.M.Pradeep, learned counsel undertakes to appear for the respondent. He is permitted to file vakalath within a period of one week.

Petitioner is before this Court being aggrieved by the orders dated 19.02.2024 produced at Annexures-A & B passed under Section 7Q & Section 14B of the Employees' Provident Funds & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (for short, 'the Act') respectively, and also order of attachment under Section 8F of the Act dated 21.08.2024 as per Annexure-J. -3- NC: 2024:KHC:37436 WP No.24586 of 2024

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the orders impugned have already been challenged before the Central Government Industrial Tribunal (CGIT) in the appeal bearing No.EPF.38/2024 as per Annexure-G and the same is pending consideration. Since, there is no regular sittings before the CGIT, petitioner is constrained to approach this Court seeking interim protection.

3. Heard and perused the records.

4. Since the petitioner has already preferred an appeal, this Court is of the view that subject to petitioner depositing 50% of Rs.6,55,970/-, which is demanded under Section 7Q of the Act, within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, there shall be stay of the impugned orders till consideration of the application by the CGIT.

5. It is made clear that if the deposit is not made as directed, the interim order granted shall automatically stands vacated.

-4-

NC: 2024:KHC:37436 WP No.24586 of 2024

6. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. Respondent-authority shall not precipitate the matter pursuant to the impugned orders until disposal of the application by the Tribunal.

SD/-

(M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE BSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19