Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Gujarat High Court

Jamnagar Municipal Corporation vs R M Dattani on 25 September, 2017

Author: R.Subhash Reddy

Bench: R.Subhash Reddy, Vipul M. Pancholi

                  C/CA/8105/2017                                            ORDER




                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

         CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 8105 of 2017
                                            In
             LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (STAMP NUMBER) NO. 823 of 2017
                                            In
                   SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11173 of 2009
         ==========================================================
                 JAMNAGAR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION....Applicant(s)
                                     Versus
                           R M DATTANI....Respondent(s)
         ==========================================================
         Appearance:
         MR HS MUNSHAW, ADVOCATE for the Applicant(s) No. 1
         NOTICE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 1
         ==========================================================

          CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. R.SUBHASH
                 REDDY
                 and
                 HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIPUL M. PANCHOLI

                                   Date : 25/09/2017


                                    ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. R.SUBHASH REDDY)

1. This application is filed to condone the delay of  87 days in preferring the Letters Patent Appeal,  aggrieved by the order dated 16.11.2016 passed in  Special Civil Application No.11173 of 2009.

2. Heard   learned   counsel   for   the   applicant.   Though  Notice is served on the respondent, there is no  appearance to oppose the application.

3. We   have   perused   the   reasons   stated   in   the  Page 1 of 2 HC-NIC Page 1 of 2 Created On Mon Oct 02 04:23:28 IST 2017 C/CA/8105/2017 ORDER application   explaining   the   delay.   Having   regard  to   the   reasons   stated,   we   deem   it   appropriate  that   this   is   a   fit   case   to   condone   the   delay.  Accordingly,   the   delay   is   condoned.   The   Civil  Application is allowed, as prayed for.

(R. SUBHASH REDDY, CJ) (VIPUL M. PANCHOLI, J.) Pravin Page 2 of 2 HC-NIC Page 2 of 2 Created On Mon Oct 02 04:23:28 IST 2017