Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Prajakta Sureshrao Kadam vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 16 January, 2024

Author: Vibha Kankanwadi

Bench: Vibha Kankanwadi

2024:BHC-AUG:947-DB


                                                                         909-ca-9964-2023.odt




                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                              WRIT PETITION NO.11842 OF 2015
                            WITH CA/9964/2023 IN WP/11842/2015

                  Prajakta d/o Sureshrao Kadam
                  Age: 27 years, Occu.: Student,
                  R/o. Gosavi's House, Trimurty Nagar,
                  Near Gajanan Maharaj Mandir,
                  Parbhani.                                           .. Petitioner
                        Versus
            1.    The State of Maharashtra
                  Through Secretary, Tribal
                  Development Department,
                  Maharashtra State,
                  Mantralaya, Mumbai.

            2.    The Scheduled Tribe Certificate
                  Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad
                  Division, Aurangabad.
                  Through its Member Secretary.

            3.    The Director of Medical Education
                  and Research, CET Cell,
                  St. George's Hospital Compound,
                  Opp, Govt. Dental College Building,
                  Near Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus
                  (CST), Mumbai.

            4.    Maharashtra University of Health
                  Sciences, Vani Road, Nashik,
                  Through its Registrar.

            5.    The Dean,
                  Government Ayurvedic College,
                  Nanded.                                             .. Respondents

                                                  ...
            Mr. M. L. Paithane h/f Mr. A. S. Golegoankar, Advocate for petitioner.
            Mr. N. S. Tekale, AGP for respondent Nos.1 and 2.
            Mr. U. S. Malte, Advocate for respondent Nos.3 and 4.
                                                  ...


                                                 [1]
                                                               909-ca-9964-2023.odt




                          CORAM :         SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI AND
                                          S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, JJ.
                          DATE      :     JANUARY 16, 2024.

ORDER :

-

. The writ petition was filed for direction to respondent No.2 Committee to decide the tribe claim of the petitioner, which is pending since 18.12.2013. The petition is filed in the year 2015 and it is still pending. By order dated 08.12.2015, interim relief was granted in the nature that no coercive action to be taken against the petitioner on the ground of her failure to produce the caste validity certificate. Further by way of filing Civil Application No.9964 of 2023 on 24.07.2023, she prayed for direction against respondent No.3 to 5 to allow her to appear for examination and complete her remaining studies, pending decision of the Committee. It appears that it is in respect of her desire to appear for third year exam. But now it appears that the said exam would have been over, thereby the said civil application as regards prayer clause 7(b) has become infructuous. Prayer clause 7(c) is in fact, the main prayer in the petition.

2. Learned AGP, on instructions, submits that the Committee would take one month to decide the tribe claim of the petitioner. The said statement is taken as undertaking and instead of keeping the matter further pending, it can be so disposed of on the basis of the statement made. Hence, the [2] 909-ca-9964-2023.odt following order :-

ORDER
1. Writ Petition stands allowed.
2. Respondent No.2 Committee to decide the tribe claim of the petitioner within a period of one month from the date of this order.
3. Civil Application No.9964 of 2023 stands disposed of.
4. No coercive action be taken against the petitioner on the ground of her failure to produce caste validity certificate till the decision by the Committee.

[ S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR ] [ SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI ] JUDGE JUDGE scm [3]