Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 10, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Shivapura Geleyara Kreeda Mathhu vs The State Of Karnataka on 27 November, 2012

Author: Dilip B.Bhosale

Bench: Dilip B Bhosale

                            1


        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

           DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2012

                          BEFORE

          THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DILIP B BHOSALE

               W.P.NO. 46370/2012 (GM-POLICE)


BETWEEN

SHIVAPURA GELEYARA KREEDA MATHHU
SAMSKRUTHIKA SANGHA(R)
HAVING ITS OFFICE AT SIDAPPA BUILDING
M C ROAD, OPP SATHYAGRAHA SOWDHA
SHIVAPURA, MADDUR TALUK
MANDYA DISTRICT-571428
REP BY ITS PRESIDENT                  ... PETITIONER

(BY SRI. SRIDHAR C.K., ADVOCATE )


AND

1.    THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
      REP BY ITS SECRETARY
      HOME DEPARTMENT
      VIDHANA SOUDHA
      BANGALORE-560001

2.    THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
      MANDYA DISTRICT
      MANDYA-571401

3.    THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
      MADDUR POLICE STATION
      MADDUR TOWN-571428
                                     2


4.        THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE
          MADDUR POLICE STATION
          MADDUR TOWN-571428                    ... RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. E.S. INDIRESH, HCGP)

     THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE
RESPONDENT POLICE NOT TO INTERFERE WITH THE NORMAL
ACTIVITIES OF THE PETITIONER'S CLUB AND NOT TO INSIST
THE PETITIONER TO OBTAIN LICENSE / PERMISSION TO CARRY
ON THE INDOOR GAMES LIKE CHESS, CAROM, RUMMY, BEST
OF SEVEN, JACKPOT AND SPORTS INCLUDING OTHER
CULTURAL ACTIVITIES, PERMISSIBLE UNDER LAW.

      THIS W.P. COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

PC:

          The petitioner in the present writ petition seeks the

following relief:

     a.       Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing
              the respondents not to interfere with the normal
              activities of the petitioner's club and not to insist
              the petitioner to obtain license / permission to
              carry on the indoor games like chess, carom,
              rummy,    best   of   seven,   jackpot   and   sports
              including other cultural activities, permissible
              under law.
                                3


      2. In past, this Court came across several such

petitions and all such petitions were disposed of with

direction to the respondents not to interfere with the lawful

recreational activity carried on by the members of the

petitioner - society making it clear that the respondent

however, will have an opportunity to take any appropriate

action according to law if the petitioners - societies indulge

in any unlawful activity.


      3. Petitioners are associations / societies, registered

under the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960 (for

short `the Act').    Section 3 of the Act deals with the

societies to which the Act applies; section 4 provides for

condition of registration; section 5 provides for mode of

forming societies; section 6 provides for requirements with

respect to memorandum of association of every society

and section 27 provides for cancellation of registration and

dissolution of certain societies.
                               4


      4. Section 6 provides for requirements with respect

to memorandum of association and under this provision it

is mandatory for every society to have memorandum of

association, rules and regulations of the society which shall

contain provisions relating to admission of members,

general meetings, proceedings at such meetings including

voting by members, the governing body and proceedings

at such meetings      including voting by members the

governing body and proceedings of meetings of the

governing body, etc. Thus, the petitioners - societies are

suppose   to   run their   clubs   in accordance   with the

provisions of the Act and the Rules framed thereunder.


      5. This Court, while dealing with the writ petitions,

instituted by clubs, such as the petitions herein, had an

occasion to consider the Karnataka Police Act, 1963, in

particular, sections 2(14) & 2(15) thereof. Sections 2(14)

and 2(15) define "place of public amusement" and "place

of public entertainment" and after considering these
                                 5


definitions,    this    Court    in   RAMA      RECREATION

ASSOCIATION vs. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE -

1993 ILR NULL 3357, 1993 (4) Kar.L.J. 542 observed

thus:

        " In a Club, there may be any diversion or
        game but that by itself will not convert the
        place into the place of public amusement. If,
        at such a place music, singing, dancing or any
        diversion or game or means of carrying on the
        same is provided to which the public are
        admitted, only then it will be a place of
        amusement. Similarly, regarding the place of
        public entertainment there should be a
        provision to admit the public, where food or
        drink is supplied for consumption. A Club is a
        place to which only its members are permitted
        to engage in any diversion or recreational
        activities etc. The members of the public are
        not entitled to demand any entrance either
        freely or on payment of any sum. The entry to
        the Club is restricted by the terms of the bye-
        laws and it is a well-known fact that it is
        always restricted to its members. Therefore,
        such an Association as that of the petitioner,
        cannot be compelled to obtain a licence under
        the      Licensing     Order.        Consequently,
        respondents are directed not to interfere with
        the lawful activities of the petitioner -
        Association. However, it is open to the police
        to verify and find out the nature of the
        activities, so that the Club premises may not
        be used for any illegal activities."
                              6



      6. Having regard to the Judgment of this Court in

RAMA RECREATION ASSOCIATION and the orders

placed on record by the petitioners at Annexures C & D

passed in W.P. No.43968/12, I am satisfied that all these

writ petitions can be conveniently disposed of by the

following order:

                          ORDER

1. The petitioners' associations / societies immediately after their registration and / or at any point of time before they start running the club, shall approach the concerned police station with copy of their registration under the Act along with copy of the memorandum; the list of the members and lease agreement or any other document/s in respect of the premises of the club. They shall tender all these documents to the concerned police station with their covering letter;

7

2. The associations / societies shall update list of members submitted to the police after every three months, if there is any change in the list of members;

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners' associations / societies state that members of the society alone will have entry in the premises of the society and that the members shall not be permitted to introduce guests in the club. Their statements are accepted;

4. The respondents are directed not to interfere with the lawful recreational activities carried on by the members of the societies. This, however, shall not preclude them to take any appropriate action in accordance with law, if the petitioners' associations / societies indulge in any unlawful / immoral activity;

5. The concerned police station shall also have liberty to visit the club premises periodically or on receipt of any information about their activities which could be termed as 8 unlawful. It is needless to mention that police shall take care that their visit to the club shall not cause harassment to the members of the Managing Committee/the club.

With these observations, petition is disposed of.

Sd/-

JUDGE SAK