Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 4]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Indrasen Jain vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 21 August, 2019

Author: Sanjay Yadav

Bench: Sanjay Yadav

                The High Court Of Madhya Pradesh

      Common Conditional Orders in the matters relating to

              Serial Nos. 1001 to 1008 as per cause list

Gwalior, dated: 21.08.2019

      The Court proposes to pass this common conditional order to

obviate passing of identical conditional order in these matters

involving similar office objection/default :

      In all these matters, due to non-removal of office objection

within the prescribed time as per the Rules, the concerned matter was

placed before the Registrar in the first instance. The Registrar granted

sufficient time to the petitioner(s) applicant(s)/appellant(s) to cure the

defect/office objection, however, due to non-removal of office

objection/default within the prescribed time, the concerned matter was

required to be once again listed before the Court. The Court granted

further time, by passing common order on the earlier occasion.

      In spite of repeated opportunity ( three times-one under Rules,

second by the Registrar and third by Court), the petitioner(s),

applicant(s)/appellant(s) has failed to cure the office objection/default.

As a result, by way of indulgence and last opportunity, in terms of this

order, SIX WEEKS further time is granted to the petitioner(s),

applicant(s)/appellant(s) in the respective matters to remove office

objection/default and make the matter ready for further hearing within

that time, failing which the concerned petition/application/appeal shall

stand dismissed for non-prosecution without further reference to the

Court.
                                                                        2

                                     Provided, however, in cases, where the objection/default is

                               about non-service of any of the respondent, on expiry of the

extended period, the concerned matter will stand dismissed for non-prosecution only against the unserved respondent (s), without further reference to the Court. The matter would then proceed against the remaining respondent (s).

In cases where the office objection/default has already been cured before passing of this order, it will be open to the concerned party to bring that fact to the notice of the Registrar (Judicial-II), who may examine the same and proceed with the matter as per the listing scheme, if ready for hearing.

If the office objections are removed within the time extended in terms of this order, the concerned matter(s) be made returnable on the date notified hereafter.




                                     Cases as per cause list number             Returnable Date

                                               1001 to 1008                        14/10/2019




                                          (Sanjay Yadav)                   (Vivek Agarwal)
                                              Judge                            Judge


Aman



 Aman Tiwari
 2019.08.21 18:04:16 +05'30'