Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Raj Kumar Alias Raju vs State Of Punjab on 15 May, 2012

Author: Ram Chand Gupta

Bench: Ram Chand Gupta

Crl.M.No.M-11451 of 2012(O&M)                                        -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB                        AND HARYANA AT
                 CHANDIGARH.

                                     Crl.M.No.M-11451 of 2012(O&M)
                                     Date of Decision: May 15, 2012

Raj Kumar alias Raju
                                                   .....Petitioner
                                v.
State of Punjab
                                                   .....Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA

Present:    Mr.J.S.Khiva, Advocate
            for the petitioner.
                   .......

RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral)

Crl.M.No.23325 of 2012 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.No.M-11451 of 2012 The present petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.179, dated 7.10.2011, under Section 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, (for short `the Act') registered at Police Station City-I, Mansa, District Mansa.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the whole record carefully, including the impugned order passed by learned Judge, Special Court, Mansa, vide which application filed on behalf of the present petitioner for regular bail was dismissed.

This is second application for regular bail filed on behalf of petitioner-accused before this Court. His earlier bail application for bail was got dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 22.2.2012 passed in Crl.M.No.M-11451 of 2012(O&M) -2- Crl.M.No.M-5164 of 2012.

Brief allegations against petitioner-accused are that police party was on patrol duty when petitioner-accused was apprehended alongwith a bag in his hand. The same was searched and on search 1 kg narcotic powder was recovered from his possession. As per report FSL, it was found containing Diphenoxylate hydrochloride to the extent of 2.35% in the sample of 10 grams. As per notification issued vide Notification No.2941 (E) dated 18.11.2009, the entire mixture is to be considered and hence, recovery falls within the category of commercial quantity.

Hence, in view of the bar created under Section 37 of the Act, petitioner is not entitled for bail.

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition filed by petitioner-Raj Kumar alias Raju for grant of bail is, hereby, dismissed being devoid of any merit.





15.5.2012                                          (Ram Chand Gupta)
meenu                                                   Judge