Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

The National Small Industries ... vs M/S.Mysore Lamp Works Limited on 6 April, 2023

Author: P.S.Dinesh Kumar

Bench: P.S.Dinesh Kumar

                                                 -1-
                                                              RFA No. 1556 of 2010




                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                              DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF APRIL, 2023

                                               PRESENT

                           THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR

                                                 AND

                             THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA

                      REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1556 OF 2010 (MON)

                      BETWEEN:

                      THE NATIONAL SMALL INDUSTRIES
                      CORPORATION LTD.,
                      THE COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER
                      THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956
                      WHOLLY OWNED BY GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
                      HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE
                      AT NSIC BHAVAN, OKHLA INDUSTRIAL
                      ESTATE, NEW DELHI-110 020
                      AND HAVING ONE OF ITS BRANCH OFFICES
                      AT NO.C-424, PEENYA 1ST STAGE
                      BEHIND PEENYA POLICE STATION
                      BANGALORE-560 058
                      REPRESENTED BY ITS
                      CHIEF MANAGER
Digitally signed by   SRI. M.L. PRAKASHA                             ... APPELLANT
ANUSHA V
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA             (BY SHRI. S. KRISHNA SWAMY, ADVOCATE)

                      AND:

                      1.     M/s. MYSORE LAMP WORKS LIMITED
                             OLD TUMKUR ROAD
                             MALLESHWARAM WEST
                             BANGALORE-560 055
                             REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN
                             AND MANAGING DIRECTOR

                      2.     M/s. CANARA LIGHTING INDUSTRIES LIMITED
                             93/1, 1ST FLOOR, HPBT BUILDING
                                    -2-
                                                RFA No. 1556 of 2010




          BATA COMPOUND, POKHRAN ROAD
          NO.1, THANE-460 601
          A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE
          COMPANIES ACT, 1956
          REPRESENTED BY ITS
          MANAGING DIRECTOR
          SRI.T.S.PAI                               ... RESPONDENTS

(BY Ms. G.K. BHAVANA, ADVOCATE FOR
    SHRI. K. CHANDRAKANTH PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
    NOTICE NOT ORDERED IN R/O R1)

          THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96, OF CPC, AGAINST
THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 31.05.2010 PASSED IN
O.S.8280/2001 ON THE FILE OF THE XXVII-ADDITIONAL CITY
CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR RECOVERY
OF MONEY.


          THIS     RFA,   COMING   ON    FOR   ORDERS,    THIS   DAY,
P.S.DINESH KUMAR, J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:


                             JUDGMENT

Shri S.Krishnaswamy, learned advocate for the appellant has filed a memo dated 06.11.2019 seeking leave to withdraw this appeal. He prays that office may be directed to refund court fee in terms of Section 66(c) of the Karnataka Court Fee and Suits Valuation Act, 19581.

1

'The Act' for short -3- RFA No. 1556 of 2010

2. Memo dated 06.11.2019 reads as follows:

"MEMO FILED BY APPELLANT
1. By agreement of parties, it was agreed upon that the payment of Rs10700000/ made by M/s.Mysore Lamp Works Limited be adjusted towards the debt due by Canara Lighting (the 2nd defendant) and consequently, the appellant shall return the excess amount of Rs.5,98,801/- received from 2nd defendant.
2. NSIC has received Rs10700000 from Mysore lamp works limited
3. Therefore, the appellant has refunded Rs.5,98,201/-
to the 2nd defendant which the 2nd respondent acknowledges. In the circumstances, the matter stands compromised.
4. Wherefore it is prayed that the Hon'ble Court be pleased to take on record the payment made by the appellant and permit the appellant to withdraw the appeal and pray for refund of court fee paid in the court in the interest of equity and justice."

(sic)

3. Ms.G.K.Bhavana, learned advocate appearing for respondent No.2 submits that she does not have instructions whether Rs.5,98,801/- is received by respondent No.2.

-4- RFA No. 1556 of 2010

4. In any event, appellant seeks leave to withdraw this appeal. Leave granted. This appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.

5. Registry shall refund court fee as per Section 66(c) of the Act.

No costs.

Sd/-

JUDGE Sd/-

JUDGE AV