Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

State Of Punjab & Ors vs Avtar Singh And Ors on 7 April, 2015

Bench: Satish Kumar Mittal, Harinder Singh Sidhu

                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                                              AT CHANDIGARH


                                                     LPA No. 257 of 2015 (O&M)

                                                     Date of Decision:-07.04.2015

                      The State of Punjab and another
                                                                  .....Appellants

                                    Versus

                      Avtar Singh and others

                                                                 .....Respondents

                      CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL.
                               HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARINDER SINGH SIDHU.

                      Present:-     Mr. K.K. Gupta, Addl.AG Punjab
                                    for the appellants.

                                         ****

                      SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J.(Oral)

This intra-court appeal under Clause-X of the Letters Patent has been filed by the State of Punjab and others against the judgment dated 14.10.2014 passed in CWP No. 15740 of 2012 whereby the writ petition filed by the private respondents No. 1 to 18 was allowed by the learned Single Judge, in terms of decision dated November 08, 2012 passed in LPA No.108 of 2012 (State of Punjab and another Versus Rupinder Pal and others) while holding that the respondents are entitled to the benefit of pension scheme under the Pension Rules which were in existence on January 16, 2002 and not under the new pension scheme which was introduced on January 1, 2004.

REEMA SAINI 2015.04.20 15:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh LPA No. 257 of 2015 -2-

It has not been disputed before us that the case of Rupinder Pal and others who were respondents in LPA No.108 of 2012 is exactly the same as of the respondents herein. Those respondents who were also given notional appointment w.e.f. 2002 have been held entitled to the pension under the Pension Rules, which were applicable before the new pension scheme introduced in the year 2004. It has also not been disputed that the decision in the said LPA has become final between the parties as no SLP has been filed against the same.

In view of the fact that the issue raised in this appeal has already been decided against the State in the aforesaid appeal, we do not find any further ground to interfere in the same.

Dismissed.


                                                             ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL)
                                                                       JUDGE



                      07.04.2015                             (HARINDER SINGH SIDHU)
                      reema                                          JUDGE




REEMA SAINI
2015.04.20 15:50
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this document
High Court, Chandigarh