Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court

Basudeb Ganguly vs Chitta Ranjan Das & Ors on 17 February, 2010

Author: Mohit S. Shah

Bench: Mohit S. Shah, Pinaki Chandra Ghose

               1




IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
        ORIGINAL SIDE




      GA No. 295 of 2010
      APOT No. 37 of 2010
        Basudeb Ganguly
             Versus
    Chitta Ranjan Das & Ors.

      GA No. 225 of 2010
      APOT No. 52 of 2010
      CC No. 197 of 2009
      WP No. 226 of 2009
        Basudeb Ganguly
             Versus
    Chitta Ranjan Das & Ors.

      GA No. 226 of 2010
      APOT No. 53 of 2010
      CC No. 197 of 2009
      WP No. 226 of 2009
          K. R. Kamath
             Versus
    Chitta Ranjan Das & Ors.

      GA No. 227 of 2010
      APOT No. 54 of 2010
      CC No. 197 of 2009
      WP No. 226 of 2009
         M.V. Tankasale
             Versus
    Chitta Ranjan Das & Ors.
                                     2


                          GA No. 228 of 2010
                          APOT No. 55 of 2010
                          CC No. 197 of 2009
                          WP No. 226 of 2009
                              Nagesh Pydah
                                 Versus
                        Chitta Ranjan Das & Ors.

                          GA No. 229 of 2010
                          APOT No. 56 of 2010
                          CC No. 197 of 2009
                          WP No. 226 of 2009
                              B. P. Sharma
                                 Versus
                        Chitta Ranjan Das & Ors.




For Appellants   : Mr. L.K. Gupta, Sr. Advocate,
                   Mr. Soumya Majumder,
                   Mr. Biswarup Bhattacharya, Advocates

For Respondents : Mr. Sunrit Deb,

Mr. I.C. Sharma, Advocates Before :

The Hon'ble CHIEF JUSTICE MOHIT S. SHAH The Hon'ble Justice PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE Date : 17th February, 2010.
The Court : Learned Counsel for the respondent-writ petitioner states that the writ petitioner will not press the contempt application pending before the Learned Single Judge.
3
In view of the above statement, no further order is required to be passed in these appeals except recording the above statement.
The appeals and the connected applications are disposed of. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.
(MOHIT S. SHAH, CJ.) (PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, J.) SN.
Asst.Registrar(CR)