Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Central Information Commission

Dr. D. D. Joshi vs Ministry Of Human Resource Development on 26 July, 2023

Author: Heeralal Samariya

Bench: Heeralal Samariya

                             केन्द्रीय सूचना आयोग
                      Central Information Commission
                          बाबा गंगनाथ मागग ,मुननरका
                       Baba Gangnath Marg, Munirka
                       नई निल्ली, New Delhi - 110067

 नितीय अपील संख्या/Second Appeal No.: CIC/MOHRD/A/2022/647840

 Dr. D. D. Joshi                                     .....अपीलकताग /Appellant

                                    VERSUS/बनाम


 Public Information Officer Under RTI,
 Jamia Hamdard (Ministry of Education),
 Mehrauli-Badarpur Road, Near Batra Hospital,
 Block-D, Hamdard Nagar, New Delhi-110062.


                                                        ...प्रनतवािीगण/Respondents

Relevant facts emerging from appeal:

  RTI application filed on          :   18.06.2022
  CPIO replied on                   :   27.06.2022
  First appeal filed on             :   25.07.2022
  First Appellate Authority order   :   29.09.2022
  Second Appeal received at CIC     :   06.09.2022
  Date of Hearing                   :   26.07.2023
  Date of Decision                  :   26.07.2023




                   सूचना आयुक्त   : श्री हीरालाल सामररया
            Information Commissioner:    Shri Heeralal Samariya




                                                                      Page 1 of 4
 Information sought

:

The Appellant sought following information:
• PIO furnished reply, vide letter dated 27.06.2022, as under:
• Dissatisfied with the response received from PIO, Appellant filed First Appeal, vide letter dated 25.07.2022.
• PIO furnished reply vide letter dated 29.09.2022:
• Written submission has been received from the Appellant vide letter dated 03.07.2023, as under :
Page 2 of 4
Grounds for Second Appeal:
The PIO has not provided correct information to the Appellant.
Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing: The following were present: -
Appellant: Absent Respondent: Mr. Mirza Rahil Beg, Systems Analyst/PIO, Jamia Hamdard The Respondent stated that the relevant information relating to Mr. G. N. Qazi has been duly furnished to the Appellant from their official record. He further stated that he would abide by the order of the Commission if any.
Decision:
Perusal of records reveals that information as defined under Section 2(f) of the RTI Act from available official records, has been duly provided to the Appellant, in terms of provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Thus, the Commission is of the considered opinion that no further intervention of the Commission is warranted in this case.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly.
Heeralal Samariya (हीरालाल सामररया) Information Commissioner (सूचना आयुक्त) Authenticated true copy.
(अनिप्रमानणतसत्यानपतप्रनत) Ram Parkash Grover (रामप्रकाशग्रोवर) Dy. Registrar (उप-पंजीयक) 011-26180514 Page 3 of 4 Page 4 of 4