Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Cavelossim Villagers Forum Cavelossim ... vs M/S Shree Balaji Concepts A Partner Firm ... on 14 November, 2017

     Item No.52                                        1

                                           REGISTRAR COURT. 2                          SECTION IX

                                    S U P R E M E C O U R T O F               I N D I A
                                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


                                         BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SANJAY PARIHAR


     Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)                             No(s).    34831/2016


     CAVELOSSIM VILLAGERS FORUM CAVELOSSIM VILLAGERS FORUM A SOCIETY
     REGISTERED UNDER THE SOCEITEIS ACT 1                  Petitioner(s)


                                                            VERSUS


     M/S SHREE BALAJI CONCEPTS A PARTNER FIRM THROUGH                              ITS PARTNER
     MRS. RADHA SATISH TIMBLO                                                         Respondent(s)


     (AS PER DIRECTION OF LD. REGISTRAR COURT MATTER IS LISTED ON
     24/07/2017)


     Date : 14-11-2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.


     For Petitioner(s)                    Ms. Upma Shrivastava,Adv.
                                          Ms. Madhumita Bhattacharjee, AOR


     For Respondent(s)                    Mr. Jai A. Dehadrai,Adv.
                                          Mr. S.S. Rebello,Adv.
                                          Ms. Supriya Juneja, AOR


                                          Mr. Anjuman Tripathy,Adv.
                                          Mr. Jayant Mohan, AOR

                             UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                O R D E R
Signature Not Verified Respondent Nos. 1,2, 3 and 5 have already filed the counter Digitally signed by

affidavit.

MADHU GROVER Date: 2017.11.15 14:32:23 IST Reason:

Respondent Nos. 6 to 8 and 10 has not filed the counter affidavit. It is contended by the Ld. Counsel for the said respondents that he adopts the counter affidavit filed by Item No.52 2 Respondent Nos. 1,2, 3 and 5. This is taken on record. He further submits that he would be filing vakalatnama on behalf of respondent No.9 also and Respondent No. 9 is not interested to file counter affidavit rather he would adopts the counter affidavit filed by Respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 5.

Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the learned counsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated 5.9.2017 of this Court in respect of respondent No.4. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served.

List again on 11.1.2018.

SANJAY PARIHAR Registrar MG