Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Delhi High Court - Orders

Mensa Brand Technologies Private ... vs Registrar Of Trade Marks on 17 March, 2025

Author: Amit Bansal

Bench: Amit Bansal

                                    $~2
                                    *           IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                                    +           C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 9/2025 & I.A. 6794-6795/2025

                                                MENSA BRAND TECHNOLOGIES
                                                PRIVATE LIMITED                         .....Appellant
                                                              Through: Mr. Aditya Gupta, Mr. Siddharth
                                                                       Varshney and Ms. Aakriti Bansal,
                                                                       Advocates
                                                              versus
                                                REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS                .....Respondent
                                                              Through: Ms. Nidhi Raman, CGSC with
                                                                       Mr. Debasish Mishra, Advocate for R1

                                                CORAM:
                                                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
                                                             ORDER

% 17.03.2025

1. This appeal has been filed under Section 91 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 challenging the order dated 13th June, 2024, passed by the Registrar of Trade Marks in trademark application no.4488111.

2. Mr. Aditya Gupta, counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the mark which was cited in the impugned order and was the basis of refusal had been assigned in favour of the appellant, and the assignment deed was duly filed before the Trade Mark Registry.

3. Issue notice.

4. Notice is accepted on behalf of the counsel for the respondent, who seeks time to take instructions.

5. Reply, if any, be filed within two weeks.

6. Rejoinder thereto, if any, be filed within one week thereafter.

C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 9/2025 Page 1 of 2

This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/03/2025 at 22:33:02

7. List on 23rd April, 2025.

AMIT BANSAL, J MARCH 17, 2025/ds C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 9/2025 Page 2 of 2 This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/03/2025 at 22:33:02