Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Patna High Court - Orders

Ranjeet Prasad vs The Union Of India &Amp; Ors on 4 April, 2011

Author: Birendra Prasad Verma

Bench: Birendra Prasad Verma

                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  CWJC No.7914 of 2004
                       RANJEET PRASAD, SON OF LATE DAMODAR PRASAD,
                       RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MAKRAUTA, P.S. KARAI
                       PARSURAI, DISTRICT- NALANDA
                                             ------------ PETITIONER.
                                            Versus
                   1. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE CHIEF ELECTION
                       COMMISSIONER, NEW DELHI.
                   2. ELECTION OFFICER, BIHAR, MANGLES ROAD, PATNA.
                   3. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY,
                       GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA.
                   4. FINANCE SECRETARY, STATE OF BIHAR, PATNA.
                   5. HOME SECRETARY, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA.
                   6. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, NALANDA AT BIHARSHARIF.
                   7. SUPERINTENDENT       OF       POLICE,      NALANDA AT
                       BIHARSHARIF.
                   8. DEPUTY COLLECTOR, LAND REFORMS, HILSA, DISTRICT
                       NALANDA.
                   9. SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, HILSA, DISTRICT- NALANDA.
                   10. OFFICER-IN-CHARGE OF HILSA POLICE STATION,
                       DISTRICT NALANDA --- RESPONDENTS.
                                            -----------
5/    04-04-2011

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Learned Assistant Counsel to G.P. 26 by placing reliance on the averments made in the counter-affidavit filed on behalf of respondent no. 6 to 10 submits that the grievances raised herein by the petitioner have already been redressed by the competent authorities and compensation amount has already been paid to him.

In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, no useful purpose will be served by keeping the matter pending any longer.

According, the writ petition stands dismissed.

( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.) BTiwary/