Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati

Padala Ganesh Kumar vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 2 December, 2025

APHC010503372018
                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
                                    AT AMARAVATI                  [3369]
                             (Special Original Jurisdiction)

                   TUESDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER
                      TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

                                 PRESENT

        THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO

                    CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1822/2018

Between:

  1. PADALA GANESH KUMAR, TECHNICAL LEADER, CAPGEMINI
     (FORMERLY KNOWN AS I GATE GLOBAL SOLUTIONS LTD) 155-
     156(P), EPIP PHASE-II, WHITE FIELD, BENGALURU KARNATAKA
     STATE.    PRESENTLY UN-EMPLOYEE, R/O MADHURAWADA, -
     VISAKHAPATNAM.

                                                           ...PETITIONER

                                    AND

  1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH,                 REP.      BY   PUBLIC
     PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT, HYDERABAD.

  2. PADALA SWETHA PADMINI, EMPLOYEE,R/O FLAT NO.303, SAI
     DURGA   RESIDENCY   1ST   ROAD,    BHARAT    NAGAR,
     KURMANNAPALEM VISAKHAPATNAM.

                                                   ...RESPONDENT(S):

Counsel for the Petitioner:

  1. G V S MEHAR KUMAR

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

  1. T V SRI DEVI

  2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)

The Court made the following:
                                        2


ORDER

1. This Criminal Revision Case has been filed by the petitioner/respondent under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, 'the Cr.P.C.') against the order dated 15.5.2018 passed in I.A.No.677 of 2017 in O.P.No.1113 of 2016 on the file of the learned Judge, Additional Family Court, Visakhapatnam.

2. Heard and perused the record.

3. As seen from the record, this Criminal Revision Case has been filed against the order dated 15.5.2018 passed in I.A.No.677 of 2017 in O.P.No.1113 of 2016 on the file of the learned Judge, Additional Family Court, Visakhapatnam. The I.A.No.677 of 2017 has been filed by the petitioner herein under Section 125(1) of Cr.P.C seeking to direct the respondent to pay interim maintenance. By impugned order dated 15.05.2018, the trial Court partly allowed the petition. Against the said order, the petitioner/respondent herein preferred the revision.

4. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that the main F.C.O.P.No.1113 of 2016 was disposed on 31.12.2020. In support of this, a copy from the e-Courts website has been filed, which reflects that the said F.C.O.P.No.1113 of 2016 was dismissed as not pressed on 31.12.2020.

5. Recording the said submission of learned Assistant Public Prosecutor and in view of the disposal of the F.C.O.P.No.1113 of 2016 on 31.12.2020, this Court finds the cause does not survives for adjudication and the matter would become infructuous.

6. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous.

Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated and the miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

____________________________ JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO Date: 01.12.2025 SR 3 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1822 of 2018 Date: 02.12.2025 SR