Kerala High Court
United Bank Limited vs Union Of India on 13 October, 2025
Author: P.V.Kunhikrishnan
Bench: P.V.Kunhikrishnan
W.P.(Crl.).No.1033 of 2025
1
2025:KER:75963
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
MONDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2025 / 21ST ASWINA, 1947
WP(CRL.) NO. 1033 OF 2025
PETITIONER(S):
UNITED BANK LIMITED
FIRST FLOOR, SH. JASSIM BIN JABOR ALI THANI
BUILDING, CORNICHE ROAD, P.O. BOX, 242, DOHA QATAR,
REPRESENTED BY THEIR POWER OF ATTORNEY JOLLY
MALAYIL, AGED 61 YEARS, S/O LATE JOSEPH ABRAHAM,
NANDANAM, 2ND FLOOR, THOUDAYIL ROAD, PANAMPILLY
NAGAR, COCHIN, PIN - 682036
BY ADV. SRI.K.R.SUNIL
RESPONDENT(S):
1 UNION OF INDIA
REPRESENTED BY THE MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS,
SO(DB), 74TH SOUTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI, PIN - 110001
2 UNION OF INDIA
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY THE MINISTRY OF
FINANCE, NEW DELHI, PIN - 110001
3 ATTACHE, EMBASSY OF INDIA
VILLA NO.86&90, STREET NO. 941, AL EITHRA STREET,
ZONE63, ONAIZA, P.O. BOX 2788, DOHA, QATAR
4 STATE POLICE CHIEF
POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, TRIVANDRUM, PIN - 695010
5 THE DIRECTOR OF ENFORCEMENT
OFFICE OF THE DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT, 1ST & 2ND
FLOOR, MTNL BUILDING, JAWAHARLAL NEHRU MARG, NEW
DELHI, PIN - 110002
W.P.(Crl.).No.1033 of 2025
2
2025:KER:75963
6 AISSISTANT DIRECTOR OF ENFORCEMENT
DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT, SUB ZONAL OFFICE,
KENDRIYA BHAVAN, M.S BABURAJ ROAD, KALLAI,
KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN - 673003
7 THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF ENFORCEMENT
DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT SUB ZONAL OFFICE,
KENDRIYA BHAVAN, M.S BABURAJ ROAD, KALLAI,
KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673003
8 THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
CRIME BRANCH, ECONOMIC OFFENCES WING, KANNUR,
KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN - 670001
9 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
KULAVALLUR POLICE STATION, KANNUR DISTRICT,
PIN - 670693
0 ADDL.R10.THE MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS
REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, NEW DELHI - 110 001
SUOMOTU (IMPLEADED VIDE ORDER DATED 25/08/2025 IN
WP (CRL) 1033/25)
BY ADVS.
SHRI.P.R.AJITH KUMAR, CGC
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
DIRECTOR GENERAL OF PROSECUTION
P.NARAYANAN, SPL. G.P. TO DGP AND ADDL. P.P.
SHRI.SAJJU.S., SENIOR G.P.
SRI JAISHANKAR V NAIR, SC, ED
THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 13.10.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED
THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(Crl.).No.1033 of 2025
3
2025:KER:75963
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
--------------------------------
W.P.(Crl.) No.1033 of 2025
-------------------------------
Dated this the 13th day of October, 2025
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (Crl.) is filed seeking the following reliefs:
"1. To issue a Writ of Mandamus, Orders or Directions directing the Embassy of India, Doha, Qatar (3rd Respondent) to facilitate the petitioner bank to provide an online statement through video conference to the Respondents 6 to 8 in the presence of Officials of the 3 rd Respondent.
2. To issue a Writ of Mandamus, Orders or Directions directing the Respondent 6 to 8 to record the statement provided by the Officials of the petitioner bank given through online video conference under the provision of Section 180 of BNSS.
3. Such other orders deem fit on facts and in the interest of justice. ." [SIC]
2. The main prayer in this Writ Petition is to issue a direction to the Embassy of India, Doha, Qatar to facilitate the petitioner bank to provide an online statement through W.P.(Crl.).No.1033 of 2025 4 2025:KER:75963 video conference to respondents 6 to 8 in the presence of the officials of the 3rd respondent. The second prayer is to issue a direction to respondents 6 to 8 to record a statement provided by the officials of the petitioner bank given through online video conference under the provisions of Section 180 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS).
3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Public Prosecutor, the learned Central Government Counsel (CGC) and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Enforcement Directorate.
4. Petitioner is the United Bank Limited functioning at Qatar. Ext.P2 complaint was filed before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Thalassery through a power of attorney alleging serious financial scam. Ext.P3 affidavit was sworn by the authorised officer of the bank. On 12.01.2023, Ext.P4 FIR was registered by the 9 th respondent against the accused as Crime No.25/2023. On 11.04.2023, Ext.P5 FIR was registered as Crime No.976/2023 by the Crime Branch Department against the accused. On 21.01.2025, W.P.(Crl.).No.1033 of 2025 5 2025:KER:75963 Ext.P6 order was passed by the Deputy Director of Enforcement. The petitioner bank is functioning at Qatar. A statement of the the power attorney holder is already recorded. The Investigating Officer wants to record the statement of the officials of the bank. The petitioner submitted that the officials are ready to give the statement through online. In such circumstances, this Court directed the Public Prosecutor, CGC and the Standing Counsel appearing for the Enforcement Directorate to get instructions.
5. The Public Prosecutor submitted that the Investigating Officer is ready to record the statement through online. The CGC takes me through Sub Clause 4.6 of Clause C of the notification issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs, Government Of India as per Section 105 of the Criminal Procedure Code, in which it is stated that the request for recording of statement through audio-visual means is to be routed through Ministry of Home Affairs.
6. There is no dispute to the fact that the petitioner is the aggrieved party in this case. There is no W.P.(Crl.).No.1033 of 2025 6 2025:KER:75963 dispute to the fact that a crime is registered by the police authorities. There is no dispute to the fact that a statement of the power of attorney holder of the petitioner bank is already recorded. In such circumstances, to complete the investigation, the statement of the officials of the bank is also to be recorded.
7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I think there can be a direction to the 3 rd respondent to make necessary arrangements to see that respondents 5 to 8 are recorded their statements in accordance with the law. Necessary arrangements shall be made by the 3 rd respondent. If there is any expense for facilitating the online recording of statement, the petitioner should bear the same. The petitioner can produce a certified copy of the judgment before respondents 5 to 8 so that a date for recording the statement can be fixed in consultation with the 3rd respondent.
Therefore, this Writ Petition (Crl.) is disposed of in the following manner:
The 3rd respondent will make necessary W.P.(Crl.).No.1033 of 2025 7 2025:KER:75963 arrangements to record the statement of the officials of the petitioner bank by respondents 5 to 8 based on a request from respondents 5 to 8. The date can be fixed based on the request from respondents 5 to 8.
Sd/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, JUDGE
DM
Judgment reserved NA
Date of Judgment 13.10.2025
Judgment dictated 13.10.2025
Draft Judgment placed 13.10.2025
Final Judgment uploaded 14.10.2025
W.P.(Crl.).No.1033 of 2025
8
2025:KER:75963
APPENDIX OF WP(CRL.) 1033/2025
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE POWER OF ATTORNEY
EXECUTED BY THE UNITED BANK LTD, DOHA, QATAR IN FAVOR OF JOLLY MALAYIL EXHIBIT P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BEFORE THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT THALASSERY EXHIBIT P3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY MRS. SADAF NAZ, MANAGER-SAM & COLLECTIONS, SAM &COLLECTIONS DEPARTMENT, UNITED BANK LTD, DOHA, QATAR EXHIBIT P4 THE TRUE COPY OF THE FIR DATED 12/01/2023 IN CRIME NUMBER 25/2023 REGISTERED BY THE 9TH RESPONDENT AGAINST THE ACCUSED ISMAIL CHAKKARATH EXHIBIT P5 THE TRUE COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO:
976/2023 REGISTERED BY THE CRIME BRANCH DEPARTMENT KANNUR EXHIBIT P6 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ECIR NO KZSZO/02/2023 A PROVISIONAL ATTACHMENT ORDER WAS PASSED BY THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF ENFORCEMENT ON 21/01/2025