Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Central Information Commission

Mr. Rajan Nirankari vs Ministry Of Personnel, Public ... on 22 February, 2011

                   CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
                  Room No.-307, 2nd Floor, B-Wing, August Kranti Bhawan
                       Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066.
                         Telefax:011-26180532 & 011-26107254
                                   Website : cic.gov.in

                                                                 Date : February 22, 2011

                    Complaint No. : CIC/WB/C/2010/000480-DS


Complainant                  :      Shri Rajan Nirankari, Delhi.
Public Authority             :      Department of Personnel & Training, New Delhi.


                                          ORDER

The Commission has received a complaint petition, dated 28/06/2010 (Diary No.:44818/2010) from Shri Rajan Nirankari in respect of his/her RTI-application on 29/03/2010 filed with the CPIO, Department of Personnel & Training (Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions), North Block, New Delhi-110001 (A Copy of RTI application is enclosed). Thereafter, the petitioner filed 1st Appeal before the First Appellate Authority of Public Authority. From the perusal of documents on record, it is seen that the same has not been adjudicated upon by the First Appellate Authority.

2. In order to avoid multiple proceedings under section 19 and 18 of the RTI Act, viz, appeals and complaints, the matter is remitted to the CPIO with the following directions:

i. In case, no reply has been given by CPIO to the complainant to his/her RTI request, the CPIO should furnish a reply to the complainant within two weeks of receipt of this order.
ii. In case CPIO has already given reply to the complainant in the matter, he/she should furnish a copy of his/her reply to the complainant within one week of receipt of this order.
iii. CPIO should invariably indicate to the complainant the name and address of st the 1 Appellate Authority, before whom the complainant can file first appeal, if any.
Page  1 iv. A copy of CPIO's reply will be endorsed to the Commission clearly indicating the case number and reason for delay, if any, in providing information.

3. In case the complainant is not satisfied with the reply received from the CPIO, he/she, under section 19(i) of the RTI Act, may file first-appeal before the FAA within the time prescribed under the RTI Act.

4. On receipt of the first appeal from the petitioner as per the above directions, FAA should dispose of the appeal within the period stipulated in the RTI Act.

5. In case complainant still feels aggrieved by the decision of FAA, he/she shall be free to approach the Commission in second appeal under section 19(3), along with complaint u/s 18, if any, within the prescribed time limit.

6. The matter is closed with above directions.

(Smt. Deepak Sandhu) Information Commissioner (DS) Authenticated true copy:

(T. K. Mohapatra) U.S. & Dy. Registrar Tele. No. : 011-26105027 [email protected] Copy to :-
1. Shri Rajan Nirankari House No. : 100 / 26, Sant Nirankari Colony, Delhi-110009.
2. Central Public Information Officer Page  2 Department of Personnel & Training (Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions), North Block, New Delhi-110001.

-:-

Page  3