Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 6]

Chattisgarh High Court

Rajesh Kumar Pandey vs State Of Chhattisgarh 44 Wps/591/2018 ... on 16 January, 2018

Author: Manindra Mohan Shrivastava

Bench: Manindra Mohan Shrivastava

                                                                                                               NAFR

                         HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                                            WPS No. 7128 of 2017

                Rajesh Kumar Pandey S/o Late Shri B L Pandey Aged About 58 Years
                Posted As Assistant Engineer, Municipal Corporation, Durg, District Durg,
                Chhattisgarh., Chhattisgarh

                                                                                             ---- Petitioner

                                                       Versus

             1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Urban Administration
                Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District
                Raipur, Chhattisgarh., Chhattisgarh

             2. The Director, Depeartment Of Urban Administration And Development,
                New Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

             3. The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Durg, District Durg,
                Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh

                                                                                        ---- Respondents

        -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For petitioner : Mr. H. S. Patel, Advocate For State : Mr. Majid Ali, GA

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order on Board 16/01/2018

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition.

2. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

(Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Rohit