Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Mrs Sheela P V vs Union Of India on 30 June, 2025

Author: S Sunil Dutt Yadav

Bench: S Sunil Dutt Yadav

                                         -1-
                                                   NC: 2025:KHC:22977
                                                 WP No. 29527 of 2024


             HC-KAR




             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                      DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025

                                      BEFORE
                  THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV
              WRIT PETITION NO. 29527 OF 2024 (GM-POLICE)


             BETWEEN:

             1.    MRS. SHEELA P V
                   WO SRI C P YOGEESHWARA
                   AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
                   R/AT NO.143, 17TH MAIN ROAD
                   BANASHANKARI II STAGE
                   BENGALURU - 560 070
                                                       ... PETITIONER
             (BY SRI. K.N. PHANEENDRA, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
                 SRI NAGARAJ SHETTY., ADVOCATE)

Digitally
             AND:
signed by
VIJAYA P
Location:    1.    UNION OF INDIA
HIGH COURT         MINISTRY OF INFORMATION & BROADCASTING
OF
KARNATAKA          ROOM NO.655, A WING
                   SHASTRI BHAVAN
                   NEW DELHI - 110 001
                   REP. BY ITS SECRETARY

             2.    THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
                   REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY
                   VIDHANA SOUDHA
                   DR B R AMBEDKAR VEEDHI
                   BENGALURU - 560 001
                            -2-
                                        NC: 2025:KHC:22977
                                   WP No. 29527 of 2024


HC-KAR




3.   THE DIRECTOR GENERAL AND
     INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
     NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
     BENGALURU - 560 001

4.   STATION HOUSE OFFICE
     C.E.N. CRIME POLICE STATION
     CENTRAL DIVISION
     BENGALURU - 560 051

5.   YOUTUBE LLC
     C/O GOOGLE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
     3RD FLOOR RMZ INFINITY
     OLD MADRAS ROAD
     E NO.3 SWAMI VIVEKANANDA ROAD
     BENGALURU - 560 008
     REP BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY

     ALSO AT:
     YOUTUBE LLC
     HAVING ITS OFFICE AT
     NO.901, CHERRY AVE
     SANBRUNO, CA-94066
     UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
     REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY
     PAULIENE SELVANANDAN

6.   GOOGLE LLC
     NO.3 3RD & 4TH AND 5TH FLOOR
     RMZ INFINITY TOWER 3
     OLD MADRAS ROAD
     SWAMI VIVEKANANDA ROAD
     BENGALURU - 560 008
     REP BY ITYS AUTHROIZED SIGNATORY
                           -3-
                                        NC: 2025:KHC:22977
                                  WP No. 29527 of 2024


HC-KAR




7.   X-CORP (FORMERLY TWITTER INC)
     HAVING ITS OFFICE AT C-20
     G BLOCK NEAR MCA
     BANDRA KURLA COMPLEX
     BANDRA (E)
     MUMBAI
     MAHARASTRA - 400 013
     REP BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY
     AYSHI KAPOOR

8.   META PLATFORMS INC/
     FACEBOOK INDIA
     HAVING ITS OFFICE AT
     UNIT NOS.1203 AND 1204
     LEVEL - 12, BUILDING NO.20
     RAHEJA MINDSPACE
     CYBERABAD, MADHAPUR
     HITECH CITY, HYDERABAD
     KARNOOL-560 081
     REP BY ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE

     ALSO AT:
     META PLATFORMS INC
     HAVING ITS OFFICE AT
     NO.1 META WAY MENLO PARK
     CALIFORNIA - 94025
     UNITED STARTES OF AMERICA
     REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY
     KATHRYN DUVALL

9.   INSTAGRAM LLC
     1ST FLOOR, SPD PLAZA
     KORAMANGALA
     INDUSTRIAL LAYOUT
     5TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA
                          -4-
                                      NC: 2025:KHC:22977
                                  WP No. 29527 of 2024


HC-KAR



    BENGALURU - 560 034
    REP BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY

    ALSO AT:
    HAVING ITS OFFICE AT 1601
    WILLOW ROAD MENLO PART
    CALIFORNIA - 94025
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
    REP BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY

    ALSO AT:
    INSAGRAM LLC,
    NO.110, LINKWAY ESTATE,
    NEW LINK ROAD, MALAD (WEST)
    MUMBAI,
    MAHARASTRA - 400 064.

    ALSO AT:
    INSAGRAM LLC
    IG INFOTECH INDIA PVT. LTD.
    EMBASSY GOLF LINK BUSINESS PARK
    CHELLAGHATTA
    BENGALURU - 560 071
    REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR

10. KUM NISHA YOGESHWAR
    D/O C P YOGESHWAR
    AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
    R/AT NO.587 1ST MAIN ROAD
    AMRJYOTHI LAYOUT
    3RD BLOCK EXTENSION
    RMV 2ND STAGE
    BENGALURU - 560 094
                                       ... RESPONDENTS
                            -5-
                                        NC: 2025:KHC:22977
                                     WP No. 29527 of 2024


HC-KAR




(BY SRI. SHANTHI BHUSHAN H., ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SMT. K.P. YASHODHA, AGA FOR R1 TO R4;
SRI KARAN JOSEPH, ADVOCATE FOR R8;
SRI MANU PRABHAKAR KULKARNI, ADVOCATE FOR R6;
SRI SRINIVASA RAGHAVAN, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR R10;
R5 - SERVED)

     THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227
OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT
THE R-4 TO TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION PURSUANT TO
THE COMPLAINT DTD 28.10.2024 LODGED BY THE
PETITIONER VIDE ANNEXURES-A AND B AND ETC.

    THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS
UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV


                      ORAL ORDER

Petitioner has filed the present writ petition seeking for issuance of writ of mandamus to direct respondent No.4 to take appropriate action pursuant to the complaint dated 28.10.2024. Petitioner has also sought for issuance of writ of mandamus to direct respondents 4 to 9 to delete / block YouTube links, Instagram ID and X-Corp account of respondent No.10, as detailed at Annexure-C. Petitioner has further sought for issuance of writ of mandamus to direct respondents 5 to 9 to delete URL links mentioned in -6- NC: 2025:KHC:22977 WP No. 29527 of 2024 HC-KAR the schedule and not to transmit, share or forward the URL links mentioned in schedule-B to the petition. Petitioner has further sought for certain other reliefs.

2. It is noticed that before the Civil Courts, petitioner and respondent No.10 are at issue in O.S.No.26115/2024 and the defendants in the said suit were restrained from publishing or web hosting or telecasting any family matters or personal matters relating to the plaintiff until further orders.

3. Sri. K. N. Phaneendra, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the reason for moving the matter was in light of certain apprehended adverse consequences on electoral prospects due to acts of publishing as referred to in the petition during the election campaign.

4. This Court by interim order dated 04.11.2024 had passed an interim order, which reads as follows: -7-

NC: 2025:KHC:22977 WP No. 29527 of 2024 HC-KAR "Sri K N Phanindra, learned Senior Counsel representing the petitioner's counsel, submits that despite the order passed by the jurisdictional Civil Court in OS No.25700/2024 and OS No.26115/2024 restraining the respondents No.5 to 10 herein and others from publishing, web hosting or telecasting any family matters or personal matters relating to the petitioner until further orders, the said respondents are continuing to publish derogatory statements against the petitioner and her family members, and he further submits that the police have not taken any action on the complaint filed by the petitioner.
Sri Shanthi Bhushan, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India is directed to accept notice for the respondent No.1.
The learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents No.2 to 4.
Issue emergent notice to the respondents No.5 to
10.

The respondents No.5 to 9 are hereby directed to delete/block the links, FaceBook ID, Instagram ID and X-Corp account of respondent No.10 -8- NC: 2025:KHC:22977 WP No. 29527 of 2024 HC-KAR mentioned in Annexure-C/schedule-B till the next date of hearing.

The office objections to be complied within three days.

Hand delivery ordered."

5. Sri. Srinivasa Raghavan, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the effect of interim order passed is far beyond what was sought for before the trial Court.

6. Various contentions have been raised. After hearing the matter for sometime, noticing that the petitioner and the 10th respondent are at issue in O.S.No.26115/2024 and also noticing that O.S.No.25700/2024 is pending between the petitioner and the media houses, and further noticing that there is an interim order in O.S.No.25700/2024 as well on same lines, it would be appropriate to relegate the parties to work out their remedy before the trial Court in the existing or even -9- NC: 2025:KHC:22977 WP No. 29527 of 2024 HC-KAR by instituting other proceedings before the Civil Court as may be found necessary.

7. Noticing the assertions of the petitioner and the pleadings made out, it would be open for the petitioner to enlarge the scope of the pending suit to seek for other reliefs including seeking for appropriate amendments to pleadings as may be found necessary.

8. Needless to state that the respondents are to adhere to the existing interim order as long as it is in subsistence while clarifying that it is always open to the respondents to seek for redressal of their grievance before the trial Court by way of appropriate measures including seeking modification / vacation or challenging the correctness of the order of the trial Court.

9. As has been observed earlier, it is open for the petitioner to seek for additional reliefs with respect to other aspects as raised in the petition which may not be a part of the pleadings before the trial Court.

- 10 -

NC: 2025:KHC:22977 WP No. 29527 of 2024 HC-KAR

10. Accordingly, petition is disposed off and all contentions are kept open. The legal questions raised are kept open. In light of the disposal of the writ petition, interim order earlier granted by this Court stands discharged.

Sd/-

(S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE VP