Supreme Court - Daily Orders
Junaid vs The State Of Gujarat on 13 February, 2023
Bench: Surya Kant, J.K. Maheshwari
1
ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.9 SECTION II-B
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).11608/2022
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 02-03-2022
in CRLMA No.1876/2022 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at
Ahmedabad)
JUNAID Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF GUJARAT Respondent(s)
Date : 13-02-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Nimish M.Kapadia, Adv.
Mr. Harshit Khanduja, Adv.
Dr. Pratyush Nandan, Adv.
Mr. B. K. Satija, AOR
For Respondent(s) Mr. Kanu Agrawal, Adv.
Ms. Swati Ghildiyal, AOR
Ms. Devyani Bhatt, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
1. The petitioner seeks enlargement on bail in FIR bearing C.R.No.II/312/2019, dated 11.07.2019, under Sections 8(c), 22(c) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short, `the NDPS Act’), registered at Police Station Athawa Lines, Surat City.
2. The allegations are that a raid was conducted and the petitioner was caught red handed in possession of Amphetamine/Methamphetamine contraband weighing 0.196 kgs., which is a commercial quantity.
Signature Not VerifiedThe petitioner was arrested at the spot Digitally signed by satish kumar yadav on 11.07.2019 and he is in custody since then. Date: 2023.02.13 17:07:48 IST Reason:
3. It is jointly brought to the notice of this Court by the learned counsel for the parties that the trial has already commenced and 3 out of 41 witnesses have been examined.
24. It is not in dispute that the conclusion of trial will take reasonable long time. The petitioner is already in custody for more than three and a half years and there are no criminal antecedents.
5. In this view of the matter, the conditions contained in Section 37 of the NDPS Act already stand substantially complied with.
6. Consequently, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Trial Court.
7. The Special Leave Petition stands disposed of accordingly.
(SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (PREETHI T.C.) DEPUTY REGISTRAR COURT MASTER (NSH)