Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Allahabad High Court

Ashok Singh vs State Of U.P. And Another on 5 March, 2020

Author: Surya Prakash Kesarwani

Bench: Surya Prakash Kesarwani





HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?Court No. - 5
 

 
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3627 of 2020
 

 
Petitioner :- Ashok Singh
 
Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Vishal Agarwal
 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Krishna Kumar Chand
 

 
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J.
 

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned standing counsel for the respondent No.1 and Sri K.K. Chand, learned counsel for the respondent No.2.

The petitioner has appeared in written examination for Trained Graduate Teachers (Social Science), which was conducted by the respondents pursuant to the Advertisement No.01 of 2016. Grievance of the petitioner is that due to human error, he darkened merely one circle in Part-II of the OMR Answer Sheet relating to Geography subject which was other than the two subjects opted by him in Part-I in the OMR Answer Sheets. For this reason, his OMR sheet has not been evaluated which is contrary to the law settled by this court by judgment dated 14.02.2020 in Writ-A No.20396 of 2019 (Manoj Kumar and 99 others vs. State of U.P. and another).

Learned counsel for the respondent No.2 submits that the grievance of the petitioner shall be considered by the respondent No.2 in the light of the judgment in the case of Manoj Kumar and 99 others (supra) and an appropriate decision shall be taken within a time bound period.

In view of the aforesaid, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent No.2 to take an appropriate decision in the matter of the petitioner in the light of the judgment in the case of Manoj Kumar and 99 others (supra), within a week from the date of submission of certified copy of this order. Thereafter, the respondent No.2 shall proceed further if the petitioner is found successful in written examination.

Order Date :- 5.3.2020 NLY