Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Nirmal Bang Securities Pvt. Ltd vs Erach Khavar on 29 October, 2018

Author: S.C. Gupte

Bench: S.C. Gupte

                                                                                                                                           arbp742-17.doc

sg                   
                                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                                   ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

                                               ARBITRATION PETITION NO.742 OF 2017
                                                              WITH
                                                NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2020 OF 2017
                                                              IN    
                                               ARBITRATION PETITION NO.742 OF 2017

                Nirmal Bang Securities Pvt. Ltd.                                                                               ...Petitioner
                                     vs
                Erach Khavar                                                                                                   ...Respondent 
                                                             WITH    
                                               ARBITRATION PETITION NO.228 OF 2018
                                                         (NOT ON BOARD)

                Erach Khavar                                                                                                   ...Petitioner
                                     vs
                Nirmal Bang Securities Pvt. Ltd.                                                                               ...Respondent 
                                                        .....
                Mr. Naushad Engineer, a/w. Mr. Sharad Bansal,   Mr. Ajay Khandhar   and
                Mr.   Jayant   Gaikwad,   i/b.   Mr.   Ajay   Khandhar,   for   the   Petitioner   in
                ARBP/742/2017 and Respondent in ARBP/228/2018.

                Mr. Bimal Rajasekhar, for Respondent in ARBP/742/17 and for Petitioner in
                ARBP/228/18.

                                                                               CORAM :  S.C. GUPTE, J.

DATED : 29 OCTOBER 2018 P.C. :

. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. The award is an NSE award under a two tier arbitration regime. The trading member is aggrieved by the appellate award of the NSE Arbitration Tribunal in favour of the Respondent, whereas the Respondent is aggrieved by reduction of his claim while granting the award. Since both parties are aggrieved by the award, Pg 1 of 2 ::: Uploaded on - 31/10/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 02/11/2018 00:57:23 ::: arbp742-17.doc the award may require consideration. Hence, both petitions are admitted.

2. The NSE has withheld an amount of Rs.46,60,000/- from the trading account of the Petitioner in Arbitration Petition No.742 of 2017. As a condition of stay of the award, the Respondent may be permitted to withdraw that amount against furnishing of a suitable bank guarantee with a view to secure the amount in case the final orders in the arbitration petition go against him and he is required to bring back the amount. The bank guarantee in the form, as may be acceptable to the Prothonotary and Senior Master of this Court, may accordingly be furnished by the Respondent for entire amount of Rs.46,60,000/-. Upon a certificate being issued by the Prothonotary and Senior Master, the Stock Exchange to release the amount of Rs.46,60,000/- to the Respondent. Subject to this condition, the execution of the impugned award is stayed. It will be open to the Court to require the Respondent to bring back the amount with interest in case the matter is decided against the Respondent. Since the bank guarantee fully covers the principal amount, the Respondent may furnish a suitable undertaking to the Prothonotary and Senior Master to bring back the same with interest, in case such interest is ordered by the Court. The Stock Exchange shall release the amount upon being satisfied about the Respondent furnishing the bank guarantee as well as the undertaking referred to above to the Court. The notice of motion is disposed of in these terms.

( S.C. GUPTE, J. ) Pg 2 of 2 ::: Uploaded on - 31/10/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 02/11/2018 00:57:23 :::