Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

M/S. Hillwood Furniture Pvt.Ltd vs Income Tax Officer (Tds) on 11 April, 2017

Author: K. Vinod Chandran

Bench: K.Vinod Chandran

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                            PRESENT:

           THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN

     TUESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF APRIL 2017/21ST CHAITHRA, 1939

                  WP(C).No. 12832 of 2017 (D)
                  ----------------------------


PETITIONER(S):
-------------

           M/S. HILLWOOD FURNITURE PVT.LTD:
           NH 17: CHUNDAM:FEROKE:CALICUT:BY V.SHERIFF:
           MANAGING DIRECTOR



            BY ADVS.SRI.P.RAGHUNATH
                   SRI.PREMJIT NAGENDRAN

RESPONDENT(S):
--------------

     1.    INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS),
           AAYAKAR BHAVAN, MANANCHIRA,
           CALICUT 673 002

     2.    INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,
           COCHIN BENCH, KAKKANAD, COCHIN-682 021

       BY SRI.K.M.V.PANDALAI, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT

       THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
       ON 11-04-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
       FOLLOWING:


SKG

WP(C).No. 12832 of 2017 (D)
----------------------------

                            APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
-----------------------


P1   PHOTOCOPY OF ORDER U/S 206C FOR 2009.10

P2   PHOTOCOPY OF ORDER U/S 206C FOR 2010.11

P3   PHOTOCOPY OF ORDER U/S 206C FOR 2011.12

P4   PHOTOCOPY OF ORDER U/S 206C FOR 2012.13

P5   PHOTOCOPY OF ORDER U/S 206C FOR 2013.14

P6   PHOTOCOPY OF ORDER U/S 206C FOR 2014.15

P7   PHOTOCOPY OF COMMON ORDER IN APPEALS AGAINST EXTS.P1 TO P6
     ORDERS

P8   PHOTOCOPY OF APPEAL FILED AGAINST EXT.P1 BEFORE SECOND
     RESPONDENT

P9   PHOTOCOPY OF APPEAL FILED AGAINST EXT.P2 BEFORE SECOND
     RESPONDENT

P10  PHOTOCOPY OF APPEAL FILED AGAINST EXT.P3 BEFORE SECOND
     RESPONDENT

P11  PHOTOCOPY OF APPEAL FILED AGAINST EXT.P4 BEFORE SECOND
     RESPONDENT

P12  PHOTOCOPY OF APPEAL FILED AGAINST EXT.P5 BEFORE SECOND
     RESPONDENT

P13  PHOTOCOPY OF APPEAL FILED AGAINST EXT.P6 BEFORE SECOND
     RESPONDENT

P14  PHOTOCOPY OF STAY PETITION FILED ALONG WITH EXT.P8 APPEAL

P15  PHOTOCOPY OF STAY PETITION FILED ALONG WITH EXT.P9 APPEAL


P16  PHOTOCOPY OF STAY PETITION FILED ALONG WITH EXT.P10 APPEAL


P17  PHOTOCOPY OF STAY PETITION FILED ALONG WITH EXT.P11 APPEAL


SKG

WP(C).No. 12832 of 2017 (D)
----------------------------


P18  PHOTOCOPY OF STAY PETITION FILED ALONG WITH EXT.P12 APPEAL


P19  PHOTOCOPY OF STAY PETITION FILED ALONG WITH EXT.P13 APPEAL

P20  PHOTOCOPY OF REVISED ORDERS GIVING EFFECT TO APPELLATE
     ORDER FOR 2009.10

P21  PHOTOCOPY OF REVISED ORDERS GIVING EFFECT TO APPELLATE
     ORDER FOR 2010.11

P22  PHOTOCOPY OF REVISED ORDERS GIVING EFFECT TO APPELLATE
     ORDER FOR 2011.12

P23  PHOTOCOPY OF REVISED ORDERS GIVING EFFECT TO APPELLATE
     ORDER FOR 2012.13

P24  PHOTOCOPY OF REVISED ORDERS GIVING EFFECT TO APPELLATE
     ORDER FOR 2013.14

P25  PHOTOCOPY OF REVISED ORDERS GIVING EFFECT TO APPELLATE
     ORDER FOR 2014.15


RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS
-----------------------         NIL

                                      /TRUE COPY/



                                      P.S.TO JUDGE

SKG



              K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
              ------------------------------------------
            W.P.(C) No. 12832 of 2017 (D)
              ------------------------------------------
                 Dated: 11th April, 2017


                     J U D G M E N T

The petitioner preferred Exts.P8 to P13 appeals and Exts.P14 to P19 stay petitions under the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('I.T Act' for short) against Exts.P1 to P6 assessment orders and the first appellate order before the 2nd respondent. The grievance of the petitioner is that even before the stay petitions have been considered by the 2nd respondent, the recovery proceedings have been initiated under the Kerala Revenue Recovery Act, 1968.

2. In the above circumstance, there shall be a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Exts.P14 to P19 stay petitions, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the certified W.P.(C) No. 12832/2017 -2- copy of this judgment and coercive proceedings shall stand stayed until such orders are passed, which order shall determine the further steps thereafter.

Writ petition disposed of.

Sd/-

K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj 11/4/17