Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Ahmedabad
Shri Bharatbhai Kantilal Sheth,, ... vs The Income Tax Officer,Ward- 5(2)(3), ... on 23 July, 2019
आयकर अपील य अ धकरण, अहमदाबाद यायपीठ 'SMC'अहमदाबाद ।
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL "SMC" BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER &SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 1514/Ahd/2015 ( नधा रण वष / Assessment Year: 1999-00) BharatbhaiKantilalSheth बनाम/ ITO rd Ward- 5(2)(3), D/3, 3 Floor, Vs. PushpamBunglow, St. Xaviers Ahmedabad (Old Jurisdiction ITO, College Corner, Navrangpura, Ward - 10(3), Ahmedabad - 380009 Ahmedabad थायीले खासं . /जीआइआरसं . /PAN/GIR No.: ADR PS3 111 N (अपीलाथ /Appellant) .. ( यथ / Respondent) अपीलाथ ओरसे/Appellant by : None यथ क ओरसे / Respondentby: Smt. Sonia Kumar, Sr. DR सन ु वाईक तार!ख/Date of Hearing 12/07/2019 घोषणाक तार!ख /Date of Pronouncement 23/07/2019 आदे श/O R D E R PER AMARJIT SINGH - AM:
The appeal filed by the assessee for A.Y. 1999-00, arise from order of the CIT(A)-5, Ahmedabad dated 25.03.2015, in proceedings under section 143(3)r.w.s. 254 of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short "the Act".
2. The solitary ground of appeal of the assessee in the instant appeal is against the decision of Ld. CIT(A) in confirming the addition made by the AO to the amount of Rs. 12,00,000/- treating is at income from undisclosed sources.
3. The fact in brief is that original return of income was filed on 30.08.1999 declaring total income at Rs. 30,326/-. The assessment u/s. 147 r.w.s. 143(3) of the ITA NO. 1514/AHD/2015 A.Y. 1999-00 Act was passed on 11.12.2006 determining the total income at Rs. 12,30,180/-. In the aforesaid assessment an addition of Rs. 12,00,000/- was made in the case of the assessee on the basis of information gathered from the search action carried out u/s. 132 of the Act in the case of master group on 20.10.2000. Duringthe search action at the above mentioned group an agreement was seized in which it was categorically mentioned that assessee had paid Rs. 12,00,000/- in cash to Parth Housing & Estate Development Ltd. towards booking of shop. During the course of assessment proceedings the assessee could not explain the source of the aforesaid cash amount paid towards booking of the shop, therefore, an amount of Rs. 12,00,000/- was added to the total income of the assessee. Thus, the CIT(A) has sustained the addition made by the AO. However, the Co-ordinate Bench of the ITAT Ahmedabad vide Order No. 1931/Ahd/2008 has restored the matter to the file of AO to re-adjudicate the same after keeping in view the observation of the ITAT in the case of Perth Housing and Estate Development Pvt. Ltd. During the course of set aside proceeding in consequence to direction of the ITAT as mentioned above the assessee has stated that there was no transaction with him and the Perth Housing and Estate Development Ltd. However, the assessee has confirmed his statement recorded u/s. 131 of the Act in which he has admitted that he had made agreement with the Perth Housing and Estate Development Ltd. During the course of set aside assessment proceeding the AO has also issued notice u/s. 133(6) of the Act to the Perth Housing and Estate Development Pvt. Ltd. but it has not made any compliance. Thereafter, a show-cause notice was issued to the assessee to show-cause why not undisclosed amount of Rs. 12,00,000/- should be added to his total income. The assessee has not made any compliance therefore the aforesaid amount was added to the total income of the assessee treating it as income from undisclosed sources.
4. The aggrieved assessee has filed appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). The Ld. CIT(A) has dismissed the appeal.
2ITA NO. 1514/AHD/2015 A.Y. 1999-00
5. During the course of appellate proceeding before us nobody has attended from the side of the AO. However, the written submission has been filed.
On the other hand, the Ld. DR has contended that in spite of issuing number of notices the assessee has not made any compliance and during the course of set aside proceeding the assessee has failed to substantiate the source of cash paid to the Parth Housing and Estate Development.
6. We have heard both the sides and perused the materials on record. The AO has made addition of Rs. 12,00,000/- on account of unexplained investment in purchase of the shop in Parth Shops & Flats Co. Op. Housing Society. During the course of search action carried out in the master group of cases on 20.10.2000an agreement for cancellation of the membership of a flat and shop dated 12.09.1998 was found and seized in which it was categorically mentioned that assessee had paid cash of Rs. 12,00,000/- in cash to Parth Housing and Estate Development Pvt. Ltd. It was also categorically mentioned that the cash was returned to the assessee on cancellation of the booking by the assessee. On the basis of aforesaid information assessment u/s. 147 r.w.s. 143(3) of the Act was made and the amount was added as undisclosed income to the total income of the assessee. Subsequently, the Co-ordinate Bench of the ITAT has set aside the assessment to the file of the AO for deciding the issue afresh after keeping in view the observation of the ITAT in the case of Parth Housing and Estate Development Pvt. Ltd. During the course of set aside assessment proceedings the assessee has reiterated its earlier submission. The assessee has also confirmed his already statement recorded u/s. 131 admitting agreement made with Perth Housing and Estate Development Pvt. Ltd. The AO has issuednotice u/s. 133(6) of the Act to the director of Parth Housing and Estate Development Pvt. Ltd. requesting to confirm the transaction as cited above taken place between their company and the assessee. However, the notice was return unserved. The AO has not received any response from the Parth Housing & Estate Developers Pvt. Ltd. with whom the assessee has 3 ITA NO. 1514/AHD/2015 A.Y. 1999-00 entered into agreement. These facts and developments were brought to the notice of the assessee vide show-cause notice dated 11.03.2013 however the assessee has also not made any compliance to the show-cause notice.
In the light of the above facts and circumstances it is established that the assessee has tried to avoid making expected compliance before the AO even during the course of set aside assessment proceedings initiated as per the direction of the ITAT. The assessee has neither made compliance to the show-cause notice dated 11.03.2013 nor cited any circumstances warranting any further intervention of the AO, therefore, we do not find any infirmity in the decision of the CIT(A). Accordingly, appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
7. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed.
This Order pronounced in Open Court on 23/07/2019
Sd/- Sd/-
(MAHAVIR PRASAD) (AMARJIT SINGH)
JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Ahmedabad: Dated 23/07/2019
TANMAY TRUE COPY
आदे श क त ल प अ े षत / Copy of Order Forwarded to:-
1. राज व / Revenue
2. आवेदक / Assessee
3. संबं'धत आयकर आयु(त / Concerned CIT
4.आयकर आयु(त- अपील / CIT (A)
5. )वभागीय त न'ध,आयकर अपील!य अ'धकरण, अहमदाबाद / DR, ITAT, Ahmedabad
6. गाड फाइल / Guard file.
By order/आदे श से, उप/सहायक पंजीकार आयकर अपील!य अ'धकरण,अहमदाबाद ।
4