Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi

Manjeet vs M/O Railways on 12 December, 2019

                                         1
                                                                     OA 2531/2019


                      Central Administrative Tribunal
                        Principal Bench, New Delhi
                                  OA No. 3580/2018
                                  MA No. 4572/2018
                       This the 12th day of December, 2019

Hon'ble Mr. S.N. Terdal, Member(J)
Hon'ble Mr. A.K. Bishnoi, Member (A)

Sh. Manjeet
S/o Sh. Madan Gopal
Aged about 33 years
618/1, Indira Colony Anand Nagar
Rohtak, Haryana.
Designation : Telephone Attendant cum Dak Khalasi
Group ā€žCā€Ÿ
                                                                   ...Applicant
(By Advocate : Mr. R.K. Shukla)

                                         Versus
1.    Union of India
      Through General Manager
      Northern Railway, Baroda House
      New Delhi.

2.    The Chief Administrative Officer
      Headquarter (Construction)
      Kashmere Gate, Delhi.

3.    Sh. Shivraj Singh
      C.C.M./T.S./Kashmere Gate
      Kashmere Gate, Delhi.
                                                                  ...Respondents
(By Advocates: Mr. Krishna Kant Sharma and Mr. A.K. Srivastava)

                                ORDER (ORAL)

Mr. S.N. Terdal :

Mr. R.K. Shukla, counsel for applicant submits that in view of the averments made by the respondents in para 4.4 of their counter to the effect that the services of the applicant have been terminated, the applicant wants to withdraw this OA with liberty to seek appropriate remedy as per law. The said para 4.4 is extracted below :
"4.4 That the statement made in para 4.4 the original application are wrong and hence denied. It is stated that the applicant was working under CCM/TS as TADK and due to his unsatisfactory service, his services was terminated on the basis of specific condition mentioned in Annexure (R-1 and R-2)"
2 OA 1155/2015

2. Prayer allowed and the OA is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. The respondents are directed to supply the termination order to the applicant within 15 days , positively, from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. In view of the same, all the pending MAs are also disposed of.

(A.K. Bishnoi)                                                    (S.N. Terdal)
 Member (A)                                                        Member (J)


/anjali/