Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Yama Mallikharjuna Reddy vs The Assistant Director Of Mines on 13 March, 2019

Author: R.Subbiah

Bench: R.Subbiah, Krishnan Ramasamy

                                                               1

                                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                       DATED: 13.03.2019

                                                             CORAM:

                                         THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH
                                                        and
                                    THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

                                                      W.P.No.6974 of 2019

                      Yama Mallikharjuna Reddy                                           .. Petitioner
                                                              Vs.
                      1. The Assistant Director of Mines,
                         Tiruvallur, Tiruvallur District.

                      2. The Revenue Divisional Officer,
                         Ponneri, Tiruvallur District.

                      3. The Tahsildar,
                         Gummidipoondi,
                         Tiruvallur District.

                      4. The Inspector of Police,
                         Arambakkam Police Station,
                         Tiruvallur District.                                            .. Respondents



                             Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying
                      for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to release the
                      petitioner's Lorry bearing Registration No.AP-27-TT-9289 which was seized on
                      06.12.2018 by the first respondent and subsequently handed over to the fourth
                      respondent herein.


                                            For petitioner    : Mr.K.S.Arumugam
                                            For respondents : Mr.D.Raghu, Govt. Advocate




http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                              2

                                                            ORDER

(The Order of the Court was made by R.Subbiah,J) The petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to release the petitioner's Lorry bearing Registration No.AP-27-TT-9289 which was seized on 06.12.2018 by the first respondent and subsequently handed over to the fourth respondent herein.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents.

3. According to the petitioner, the respondents have seized the vehicle in question on 06.12.2018 on the ground of illegal mining and till date, no order for release of the said vehicle had been passed by the respondents. Hence, he has come forward with the present Writ Petition.

4. On the other hand, it is submitted by the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents that the vehicle in question was used for illegal transportation of mines and minerals like sand and there was no valid permit and hence the vehicle was seized. He further submitted that the petitioner has no previous case.

5. In any event, as the vehicle is under the custody of the respondents from the date of seizure and considering the fact that if the same is allowed to be kept idle by exposing the same to rain and shine, it would certainly diminish http://www.judis.nic.in 3 its value, this Court is of the view that the vehicle in question may be released by imposing conditions on the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, the respondents are directed to release the vehicle in question to the petitioner within a period of 7 days from the date of compliance of the below mentioned condition Nos.(i) to (iii) :

(i) The petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) before the jurisdictional Tahsildar concerned as non-refundable deposit. After receipt of the above said amount, the same will have to be deposited by the jurisdictional Tahsildar concerned, to the credit of the District Mines and Minerals Foundation Trust as non-refundable deposit.
(ii) The petitioner shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-

(Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned jurisdictional Judicial Magistrate.

(iii) The petitioner shall give an undertaking before the respondents/authority concerned stating that he will not use the vehicle in question for any illegal activities in future and shall produce the same as and when required by the respondents and also the trial Court, failing which the respondents/trial Court is/are at liberty to confiscate the vehicle.

(iv) The petitioner shall not alienate the vehicle in question till the disposal of the proceedings before the authority concerned. http://www.judis.nic.in 4

(v) The petitioner is also directed to participate in the enquiry to be conducted by the respondents.

7. With the above observations and directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No Costs.

                                                                            (R.P.S.J)       (K.R.J)
                                                                                   13.03.2019

Office to note: Issue order copy within one week cs To

1. The Assistant Director of Mines, Tiruvallur, Tiruvallur District.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ponneri, Tiruvallur District.

3. The Tahsildar, Gummidipoondi, Tiruvallur District.

4. The Inspector of Police, Arambakkam Police Station, Tiruvallur District.

http://www.judis.nic.in 5 R.SUBBIAH, J and KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J cs W.P.No.6974 of 2019 13.03.2019 http://www.judis.nic.in