Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Gujarat High Court

Gujarat Tea Processors And Packers Ltd vs Deputy Commissioner Of on 4 April, 2013

Author: Akil Kureshi

Bench: Akil Kureshi

  
	 
	 GUJARAT TEA PROCESSORS AND PACKERS LTD....Appellant(s)V/SDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX....Opponent(s)
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	

 
 


	 


	O/TAXAP/2495/2009
	                                                                    
	                           ORDER

 

 


 
	  
	  
		 
			 

IN
			THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
		
	

 


 


 


TAX APPEAL  NO. 2495 of
2009
 


With 

 


TAX APPEAL NO. 2497 of
2009
 


 


 

================================================================
 


GUJARAT TEA PROCESSORS AND
PACKERS LTD....Appellant(s)
 


Versus
 


DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF
INCOME TAX....Opponent(s)
 

================================================================
 

Appearance:
 

MR
MANISH J SHAH, ADVOCATE for the Appellant(s) No. 1
 

MRS
MAUNA M BHATT, ADVOCATE for the Opponent(s) No. 1
 

================================================================
 

 


 


	 
		  
		 
		  
			 
				 

CORAM:
				
				
			
			 
				 

HONOURABLE
				MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI
			
		
		 
			 
				 

 

				
			
			 
				 

and
			
		
		 
			 
				 

 

				
			
			 
				 

HONOURABLE MS
				JUSTICE SONIA GOKANI
			
		
	

 


 

 


Date : 04/04/2013
 


 

 


ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) Tax Appeals are admitted for consideration of following substantial questions of law:

(i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that because of the amendment by Finance Act, 2002 w.e.f. 01.07.95 the undisclosed income can be assessed under Chapter XIV-B on the basis of the contents of regularly maintained books of accounts including the seized purchase register which was also a regularly maintained book of account?

Whether the Tribunal was right in law and in facts in upholding the additions made by the Assessing Officer by comparing the price paid for purchase of tea through Pratima Traders as compared to the lower purchase price of the same commodity when purchased through other sources?

(AKIL KURESHI, J.) (MS SONIA GOKANI, J.) (vjn) Page 2 of 2