Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Delhi

Ito, Bhiwani vs Serve Hitkari Shiksha Samiti, Bhiwani on 25 September, 2017

           IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                DELHI BENCH 'SMC', NEW DELHI
         BEFORE SHRI R.K.PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
                        ITA No. 3505/Del/2017
                       Asstt. Year : 2012-13

ITO                              Vs Serve Hitkari Shiksha Samiti
Ward-3, SCO 222,                    VPO Neeriwali
HUDA Complex                        Bhiwani
Bhiwani
(APPELLANT)                           (RESPONDENT)
                                     PAN No. AADAS1095H

           Assessee by : None
           Revenue by : Sh. T Vasanthan, Sr. DR

Date of Hearing : 25.09.2017    Date of Pronouncement : 25 . 09.2017

                               ORDER

Per R.K.Panda, AM:

This appeal filed by the revenue is directed against the order dated 31 s t March, 2017 of the CIT(A)- Hisar relating to assessment year 2012-13.

2. The revenue in its only effective ground of appeal has challenged the order of CIT(A) in deleting the addition of Rs. 10,00,000/- made on account of corpus fund.

3. An adjournment application has been filed by ld. DR seeking adjournment of the case. However, considering the low tax effect involved in the grounds of appeal raised by the revenue, the same is rejected and the appeal is taken up for adjudication.

2 ITA No. 3505/Del/2017

(Serve Hitkari Shiksha Samiti)

4. It was seen that the tax effect involved in the ground raised by the revenue is less than 10,00,000/-. When same was confronted to ld. DR, he also fairly conceded that the tax effect involved in the grounds raised by the revenue is below 10 lakhs. Therefore, following the recent CBDT Instruction no. 21/2015 dated 10/12/2015, the departmental appeal is not maintainable. Accordingly the appeal filed by the revenue dismissed on account of low tax effect.

5. In the result appeal of the revenue is dismissed. (Order Pronounced in the Court at the time of hearing itself i.e. on 25.09.2017) Sd/-

(R.K.Panda) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated: 25 /09/2017 *Binita* Copy forwarded to:

1. Appellant
2. Respondent
3. CIT
4. CIT(Appeals)
5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 3 ITA No. 3505/Del/2017 (Serve Hitkari Shiksha Samiti) Date Initial
1. Draft dictated on 25/09/2017
2. Draft placed before author 25/09/2017
3. Draft proposed & placed before the 25/09/2017 second member
4. Draft discussed/approved by 25/09/2017 Second Member.
5. Approved Draft comes to the 25/09/2017 Sr.PS/PS
6. Kept for pronouncement on 25/09/2017
7. File sent to the Bench Clerk 25/09/2017
8. Date on which file goes to the AR
9. Date on which file goes to the Head Clerk.
10. Date of dispatch of Order.