Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

S. Gurunathan, Rep By T. Sundarraj Power ... vs S. Sekar, Vasanth Motors, Tirupur on 27 June, 2023

  	 Daily Order 	   

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

 

                      BEFORE    Hon'ble THIRU. JUSTICE  R. SUBBIAH           ::      PRESIDENT                        

 

                                          Thiru.R VENKATESA PERUMAL                     ::      MEMBER 
   FA. No. 165/2018

(Against the order in C.C. No.208/2014, dated 14.12.2016, on the file of District Consumer Commission, Coimbatore)                                                                           DATED THIS THE 27th   DAY OF JUNE 2023    S.Gurunathan Rep.by T.Sundarraj - Power of Attorney, No. 44, KVR Nagar, Karuvampalayam, Tirupur                                                                   ..Appellant/complainant                                              Vs S.Sekar Vasanth Motors (Maruthi Service Centre) No.3/332, Kovai Road, Perumanallur, Tirupur                                            ..Respondent/opposite party       Counsel for the Appellant/complainant                      :   M/s S.Manoharan         Counsel for the Respondent/opposite party                :  M/s K.Venkat             This appeal is coming on before us for hearing today, this commission made the following order in open court :-

                                                
                                               Order       No representation for both. This appeal is posted today for appearance of both and for filing written arguments of appellant and for arguments in list or for dismissal. When the matter was called at 11.00 A.M, the appellant was not present  hence,  passed over and called again at 12.30 noon, then also the appellant has not appeared. Hence we are of the view that keeping the appeal pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case.  The appeal is dismissed for default.  No order as to cost.
         Sd/-                                                                                                       Sd/-

 

  R  VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                R. SUBBIAH

 

               MEMBER                                                                                  PRESIDENT