Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Gurcharan Singh Alias Jackey vs State Of Punjab on 27 April, 2021

Author: Manoj Bajaj

Bench: Manoj Bajaj

CRM-M-17558-2021                                                  1

105
           IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                       AT CHANDIGARH

                                         CRM-M-17558-2021
                                         Date of Decision: 27.04.2021

Gurcharan Singh @ Jackey
                                                                  .. Petitioner
             Vs.

State of Punjab
                                                                ..Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ BAJAJ

Present:     Mr. Manvinder Singh Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner.
                              ...
Manoj Bajaj, J. (Oral)

This petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking issuance of directions to trial Court/arresting officer to release the petitioner on bail in the event of arreste in case FIR No.115 dated 26.10.2019, under Section 22 NDPS Act, registered at Police Station Mamdot, District Ferozepur.

During the course of hearing it is not disputed by learned counsel that the concession of conditional interim regular bail was extended to the petitioner by the trial Court vide order dated 30.11.2019 (Annexure P-

1) on the sole ground that the FSL report regarding the contraband was awaited.

The argument of the learned counsel that since the FSL report has been filed, therefore, the petitioner is apprehending his arrest, is apparently misconceived, as the petitioner consciously accepted the limited concession of interim regular bail, who is well aware of its condition and operative period, therefore, it is imperative for the petitioner to surrender before the trial Court in compliance of the said order. The petitioner after 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 06-06-2021 04:51:40 ::: CRM-M-17558-2021 2 availing the concession under Section 439 Cr.P.C. cannot seek anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. In this regard, reference can be made to the decision dated 04.04.2019 delivered by this Court in "CRM-M-15464-2019 titled as Balwant Singh @ Banta Vs. State of Punjab."

Resultantly, the petition for grant of pre-arrest bail is not maintainable.

Dismissed.




                                                         (MANOJ BAJAJ)
27.04.2021                                                  JUDGE
Jasmine Kaur




               Whether speaking/reasoned               Yes   No
               Whether reportable                      Yes   No




                                  2 of 2
               ::: Downloaded on - 06-06-2021 04:51:40 :::