Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 10, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Vijay vs State Of Haryana on 19 March, 2012

Author: Rajan Gupta

Bench: Rajan Gupta

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH


                                      Crl. Misc. No. M-863 of 2012
                                      Date of decision : 19.03.2012
Vijay

                                                  ....Petitioner

                                    V/s

State of Haryana
                                                  ....Respondent


BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA

Present:     Mr. Rakesh Nehra, Advocate for the petitioner.


             Ms. Maloo Chahal, AAG Haryana.

RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL)

This is a petition filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking regular bail in a case registered against the petitioner vide FIR No. 73 dated 10.08.2011 under sections 399, 402, 365, 341, 342, 332, 353, 307 IPC and section 25 of the Arms Act at Police Station Mohana, District Sonepat.

Learned State counsel has apprised the court that out of 16 prosecution witnesses cited, 7 have already been examined and 5 have been given up. Remaining 4 witnesses will most likely to be examined on the next date of hearing i.e. 10.04.2012. Similar is the report received from the trial court.

In view of above, there is no ground made out to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this stage as trial is likely to culiminate soon. Dismissed.

Petitioner shall, however, be at liberty to file afresh in case trial is not concluded within three months.

March 19, 2012                                           (RAJAN GUPTA)
Ajay                                                          JUDGE