Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Tripura High Court

Unknown vs Noting By Officer Serial Date Office ... on 2 February, 2018

Author: S.Talapatra

Bench: S.Talapatra

Noting by Officer Serial Date                       Office notes, reports, orders or proceedings
  or Advocate      No.                                              With signature
                                                                                        WP(C) 113 of 2018
                                                            BEFORE
                                                 THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.TALAPATRA


                                02.02.2018

                                   Heard Mr. R. Datta, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.
                                   Issue notice calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why

a rule shall not be issued, as prayed for; and/or why such further and other order(s) shall not be passed as to this Court may deem fit and proper.

Notice is made returnable on 13.03.2018. The petitioner shall take steps for service of notice upon the respondents by registered post with AD within a week from today. It appears that by the circular dated 17.08.2016, the FCI has observed as under:

"It is further stated that the instant award has become implementable as per the provisions of ID Act. The reference has been answered in favour of FCI and thus the circular No. 18 of 2005 is applicable w.e.f. 01.12.2005 in its letter and spirit. It is, therefore, requested that the calculation of incentive be done strictly in terms of circular no. 18 of 2005 with immediate effect and an action plan may be made as per the age."

Subsequently, the order for recovery on the same date was passed. The petitioner had approached this court contending that the amount that has been already disbursed to the workmen shall not be recovered.

In view of the nature of the controversy, this court is of the view that till the next date no excess amount shall be realised from the petitioner.

JUDGE Saikat