Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Attingal vs By Adv.Sri.G.S.Reghunath

Author: A. Hariprasad

Bench: A.Hariprasad

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                      PRESENT:

                     THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD

               MONDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF MAY 2018 / 31ST VAISAKHA, 1940

                                 RSA.No. 1282 of 2009 (C)


     AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 25-08-2009 IN AS 8/2002 of SUB COURT,
                                     ATTINGAL

 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 29-09-2001 IN OS 53/1997 of MUNSIFF COURT,
                                    ATTINGAL

APPELLANT/APPELLANT/DEFENDANT


      INDIRA, AGED 59 YEARS,
      W/O.PAPPU, VAYALIL VEEDU, ANATHALAVATTOM,,
      MELKADAKKAVOOR DESOM, CHIRAYINKEEZHU VILLAGE.


      BY ADV.SRI.G.S.REGHUNATH



RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFFS:

1.    UNNI @ CHANDRAN,
      S/O.SREEDHARAN, AGED 56 YEARS,, VAYALIL VEEDU,
      ANATHALAVATTOM,, MELKADAKKAVOOR DESOM,
      CHIRAYINKEEZHU VILLAGE.

2.    LALITHA, AGED 54 YEARS,
      D/O.SREEDHARAN, VAYALIL VEEDU, ANATHALAVATTOM,,
      MELKADAKKAVOOR DESOM, CHIRAYINKEEZHU VILLAGE.

3.    KRISHNANKUTTY, AGED 49 YEARS,
      S/O.MADHAVAN, VAYALIL VEEDU, ANATHALAVATTOM,,
      MELKADAKKAVOOR DESOM, CHIRAYINKEEZHU VILLAGE.

        R1 & R2 BY ADVS. SMT.A.K.PREETHA
                         SRI.M.R.RAJESH


    THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21-05-2018, ALONG
WITH RSA 1284/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

                         A. HARIPRASAD, J.
                      -------------------------------
                R.S.A.Nos.1282 & 1284 of 2009
              ----------------------------------------------
             Dated this the 21st day of May, 2018


                     COMMON JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that despite sending a registered notice, parties did not turn up. The matters come up in the defect list. The appeals are dismissed for non-prosecution.

All pending interlocutory applications will stand dismissed.

SD/-

                                                    A. HARIPRASAD
JV                                                      JUDGE