Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Chattisgarh High Court

Vikas Patley vs State Of Chhattisgarh 29 Wps/4539/2018 ... on 17 July, 2018

Author: Sharad Kumar Gupta

Bench: Sharad Kumar Gupta

                                                                                      1

                                                                                NAFR

                  HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
                                    WPS No. 1110 of 2018
               Vikas Patley S/o C.B.Patley, Aged About 36 Years Presently Posted
               And Working As Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad, Gobra,
               Nawapara, District Raipur CG
                                                                        ---- Petitioner
                                           Versus
            1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Urban
               Administration And Development, Mahanadi Mantralaya, Naya Raipur,
               Post Office And Police Station Naya Raipur, District Raipur CG
            2. Under Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And
               Development, Mahanadi Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Post Office And
               Police Station Naya Raipur, District Raipur CG
            3. Director, Directorate of Urban Administration And Development,
               Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Post Office And Police Station Naya
               Raipur, District Raipur CG
                                                                    ---- Respondents
         For petitioner            None.
         For Respondent/State      Mr. R.K. Gupta, Dy. Adv. General.


Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta Order On Board 17-7-2018

1. The case is called twice even then none appears for the petitioner. It is 4.30 pm.

2. In these circumstances, this Court has no option except to dismiss the case for want of prosecution.

3. Accordingly, the case is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Sd/-

(Sharad Kumar Gupta) Judge pathak