Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati
Shiri Park vs Sc For Mc Rayalseema on 25 February, 2026
1
APHC010462772015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI [3328]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA
PRASAD
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 542/2015
Between:
1. SHIRI PARK, ANANTAPUR & 8 OTHERS, REGISTERED NO.
161/2013, REPRESENTED PRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY L.
RAVINDRANATH, S/O L. P. RANGAPPA, AGED 55 YEARS, FLAT
NO.202, SHIRI PARK VIEW APARTMENTS, WARD NO. 6,
ANANTAPUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ANANTAPUR.
2. SANGI REDDY VENKATA KRISHNA REDDY,, S/O LATE S. S IDDA
REDDY, AGED 66 YEARS, OCCUPATION: RETIRED BANK OFFICER,
R/O FLAT NO. 302, SHIRI PARK VIEW APARTMENTS, WARD NO. 6,
ANANTAPUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ANANTAPUR.
3. PEMMANA SRINIVASA REDDY,, S/O P. BALA NARAYANA REDDY,
AGED 46 YEARS, OCCUPATION: DENTIST, R/O FLAT NO. 403, SHIRI
PARK VIEW APARTMENTS, WARD NO. 6, ANANTAPUR MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION, ANANTAPUR.
4. VYZA SREE DEVI,, W/O K. JAGAN MOHAN REDDY, AGED 40
YEARS, OCCUPATION: DERMATOLOGIST, R/O FLAT NO. 402, SHIRI
PARK VIEW APARTMENTS, WARD NO. 6, ANANTAPUR MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION, ANANTAPUR.
5. KUTAGULLA VENGA REDDY,, S/O LATE K.V. VEMA REDDY, AGED 64
YEARS, OCCUPATION RETIRED OFFICER, R/O FLAT NO. 303,
SHIRI PARK VIEW APARTMENTS, WARD NO. 6, ANANTAPUR
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ANANTAPUR.
6. KANDERI JAYANTHI,, W/O K. KULAYAPPA, AGED 62 YEARS,
OCCUPATION HOUSEWIFE, R/O FLAT NO. 504, SHIRI PARK VIEW
APARTMENTS, WARD NO. 6, ANANTAPUR MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION, ANANTAPUR.
2
7. SANE RAMA CHANDRA REDDY,, S/O LATE S.P. VEERA REDDY,
AGED 70 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURIST, R/O FLAT NO.
104, SHIRI PARK VIEW APARTMENTS, WARD NO. 6, ANANTAPUR
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ANANTAPUR.
8. LINGUTLA RAVINDRANATH,, S/O L.P.RANGAPPA, AGED 55 YEARS,
OCCUPATION CONTRACTOR, R/O FLAT NO. 202, SHIRI PARK
VIEW APARTMENTS, WARD NO. 6, ANANTAPUR MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION, ANANTAPUR.
9. DEVI REDDY VENKAT VIDYAVATHI,, W/O D.V. MANOHAR REDDY,
AGED 46 YEARS, OCCUPATION: HOUSEWIFE, R/O FLAT NO. 404,
SHIRI PARK VIEW APARTMENTS, WARD NO. 6, ANANTAPUR
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ANANTAPUR.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. NAGAVENI ANANTAPUR DIST 5 OTHERS, COMMISSIONER, THE
ANANTAPURAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ANANTAPURAM CITY
AND DISTRICT.
2. SHIRI DEVELOPERS, ANANTAPUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS
MANAGING PARTNER MR. H. NADEEM AHMED, S/O H. NAZEER
AHMED, AGED 45 YEARS, RIO DOOR NO. 6-4-108/5,
MARUTHINAGAR, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT.
3. MRS M SHILPA CHOWDARY, W/O J. SIRISH REDDY, AGED 29
YEARS, EMPLOYEE IN PRIVATE COMPANY, USA, R/O 11450,
COLONY ROW UNIT 310, BROOM FIELD, CO 800021, COLARADO
STATE, U.S.A., REPRESENTED BY HER GENERAL POWER OF
ATTORNEY HOLDER, MR. H. NADEEM AHMED, S/O M. H. NAZEER
AHMED, AGED 45 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO. 6-4-108/5,
MARUTHINAGAR, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT.
4. MRS M SOWMYA CHOWDARY, W/O DR. N. BHARAT KUMAR, AGED
27 YEARS, STUDENT, RIO DOOR NO. 16-537, N.R. ESTATES,
INDIRA BHAVAN ROAD, NELLORE TOWN AND MANDAL, SPSR
NELLORE DISTRICT
5. MR G SUDHAKAR, S/O LATE GURRAM SREERAMULU, AGED 54
YEARS, R/O DOOR NO.6-3-183, RAMNAGAR, ANANTAPUR TOWN
AND MANDAL, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT
6. MR G RAVINDRANATH, S/O LATE GURRAM SREERAMULU, AGED
48 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO.6-3-183, RAMNAGAR, ANANTAPUR
3
TOWN AND MANDAL, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. K SRINIVAS
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. SC FOR MC RAYALSEEMA
2. MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
The Court made the following:
ORAL ORDER:
Heard Sri A. Aravind Reddy, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri K. Srinivas, learned Counsel for the Petitioners.
2. This Contempt Case is filed for complaining of the violation of the Interim Order dated 29.01.2015 in W.P.No.1321 of 2015.
3. It transpires from record that a learned Single Judge of this Court, vide Order dated 18.12.2025, was pleased to close the Writ Petition by leaving it open to the Respondent No.2 therein to pass appropriate Orders on the Application submitted by the Petitioners for regularization.
4. In this view of the matter, this Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs.
5. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order.
______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt:25.02.2026 Vns