Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Focal Point Phase Viii Industrial ... vs State Of Punjab & Others on 25 May, 2011

Author: Augustine George Masih

Bench: Augustine George Masih

Civil Writ Petition No. 9377 of 2011                                         -1-


        IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT
                    CHANDIGARH


                               Civil Writ Petition No. 9377 of 2011
                               Date of Decision : 25.5.2011

Focal Point Phase VIII Industrial Association (Regd.)
                                                            .......... Petitioner
                               Versus


State of Punjab & others

                                                           ...... Respondents

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH

Present :   Mr. Sudeep Mahajan, Sr. Advocate with
            Mr. Sham Lal Bhalla, Advocate
            for the petitioner.

                  ****

AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (ORAL)

The challenge in this writ petition is to the orders dated 8.3.2011 (Annexure P-17) and 10.5.2011 (Annexure P-18).

It is the contention of the counsel for the petitioner that the orders passed by this Court in CWP No. 19073 of 1996 titled ' Jeewan Parbhat Jain vs. State of Punjab & others', as also CWP No. 2435 of 2010 titled ' M/s Luxmi Caste Forge vs. State of Punjab and others', have not been complied with. His further contention is that these orders cannot be sustained as the computation made therein while considering the claim of the petitioner have not been followed as mandated by the said orders. As per the contention of the counsel for the petitioner if the impugned orders violate the orders passed by this Court, the contempt petition would be appropriate remedy available to the petitioner. As regards the computation of the amount is concerned, which according to the counsel is not correct. Civil Writ Petition No. 9377 of 2011 -2- This Court in exercise of its writ jurisdiction will not delve into calculations as it is not well-equipped to embark upon such an exercise and thus would not entertain such a claim. The petitioner may, thus, avail any other alternative remedy in accordance with law.

The writ petition stands dismissed.




25.5.2011                                (AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH)
  'sp'                                           JUDGE

delve