Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Classic Network Private Limited vs State Of Gujarat & on 30 October, 2015

Author: Akil Kureshi

Bench: Akil Kureshi, Mohinder Pal

                   C/SCA/18309/2015                                               ORDER




                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                      SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 18309 of 2015

         ==========================================================
                    CLASSIC NETWORK PRIVATE LIMITED....Petitioner(s)
                                      Versus
                        STATE OF GUJARAT & 1....Respondent(s)
         ==========================================================
         Appearance:
         MR KG SUKHWANI, ADVOCATE for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
         ADVANCE COPY SERVED TO GP/PP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
         ==========================================================

                   CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI
                          and
                          HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHINDER PAL

                                       Date : 30/10/2015


                                         ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)   Case of the petitioner  is that it had executed the contract  for strengthening the section of Bagodara­Limbdi highway which  work  was  completed  way  back  in August  2008.  Defect  liability  period was also over three years later. Four more years passed  before the authority raised a demand of Rs.88.66 lacs (rounded  off) for repairing the road which according to the petitioner was  damaged   due   to   heavy   continues   rain   during   the   monsoon  season   and   is   being   recovered   from   the   deposits   of   other   on­ going   contracts   of   the   petitioner.   The   petitioner   has   already  approached   Gujarat   Public   Works   Contracts   Disputes  Arbitration  Tribunal.  Counsel  for  the  petitioner  submitted  that  the Tribunal does not have power to grant injunction. 

Page 1 of 2

HC-NIC Page 1 of 2 Created On Tue Nov 03 01:54:28 IST 2015 C/SCA/18309/2015 ORDER   Notice returnable on 27.11.2015.

  There shall be no coercive recovery  against the demand in  question. 

  Direct service is permitted.

(AKIL KURESHI, J.) (MOHINDER PAL, J.) raghu Page 2 of 2 HC-NIC Page 2 of 2 Created On Tue Nov 03 01:54:28 IST 2015