Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Mr Sandhu Gregory vs State Of Karnataka on 11 April, 2019

Author: L.Narayana Swamy

Bench: L.Narayana Swamy

                          -1-


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

       DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF APRIL 2019

                       PRESENT

        THE HON'BLE MR. L.NARAYANA SWAMY
              ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

                         AND

     THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR

         WRIT APPEAL NO.979/2019 (GM-RES)

BETWEEN:
MR.SANDHU GREGORY
S/O.PARAM PAL SINGH SANDHU
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
R/AT NO.T/2
CRYSTAL VIEW APARTMENT
NO.62, ST. JOHNS ROAD
BANGALORE-560 042                          ...APPELLANT

(BY SRI K.SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
    SRI PAVAN G.N., ADVOCATE)

AND:
1.     STATE OF KARNATAKA
       REPRESENTED BY ITS
       CHIEF SECRETARY
       VIDHANA SOUDHA
       DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD
       BENGALURU-560 001

2.     THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
       GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA
       FINANCE DEPARTMENT
       VIDHANA SOUDHA
       BENGALURU-560 001

3.     THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
       GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA
       DEPARTMENT OF HOME
                           -2-


     VIDHANA SOUDHA
     BENGALURU-560 001

4.   BANGALORE TURF CLUB LTD.
     NO.52, RACE COURSE ROAD
     BENGALURU-560 001
     REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
     MR.PRADEEP KUMAR G.

5.   MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT
     AND FOREST
     GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
     NEW DELHI-110 003

6.   NATIONAL DOPE TESTING
     LABORATORY
     MINISTRY OF YOUTH AFFIARS &
     SPORTS, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
     JAWAHARLAL NEHRU STADIUM
     COMPLEX, EAST GATE NO.10
     NEAR MTNL BUILDING
     LODHI ROAD
     NEW DELHI-110 003

7.   CHIEF STIPENDIARY STEWARD
     BANGALORE RACE CLUB LIMITED
     RACE COURSE ROAD
     BENGALURU-560 051                  ...RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI Y.H.VIJAY KUMAR, PRINCIPAL GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE
     FOR R1 TO R3;
    SRI S.S.NAGANAND, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
     SRI S.SRIRANGA, ADVOCATE FOR C/R4)

     THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE
KARNATAKA HIGH COURTS ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO SET ASIDE
THE ORDER DATED 25.02.2019 PASSED BY THE LEARNED
SINGLE JUDGE IN WP.NO.2986/2019.

     THIS WRIT APPEAL COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE, DELIVERED
THE FOLLOWING:
                                -3-


                       JUDGMENT

Petitioner-appellant has preferred this appeal challenging order dated 25.02.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP.No.2986/2019.

2. Learned Counsel for the appellant in support of this appeal has relied upon the order dated 04.07.2018 passed by this Court in WP.No.21565/2018, wherein this Court has referred to the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of BCCI vs. CRICKET ASSOCIATION OF BIHAR & OTHERS reported in (2015)3 SCC 251, whereunder it has been held that Cricket Control Board of India is an instrumentality of the State catering to the requirement of the public at large and as such, said institution is amenable to writ jurisdiction.

3. Learned Senior Counsel for respondent submits that the judgment relied upon by the learned Counsel for the appellant is not applicable to the present case and the reasons assigned therein are not sound and proper.

4. We have heard the learned Counsel for the parties. -4-

5. The order in the writ petition discloses that none had appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the learned Single Judge by extracting prayers made in the petition and after referring to the order dated 24.06.1987 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP.No.130/1987, which has been upheld by the Division Bench of this Court by the order dated 24.11.1987 in WA.No.1106/1987, has dismissed the petition.

In view of the above, we deem it appropriate to remit the matter to the learned Single Judge to reconsider and to pass appropriate orders. The writ petition is restored to file with a request to the Hon'ble Single Judge to consider the matter on merits. The appeal is accordingly disposed of.

In view of disposal of the appeal, IA.No.1/2019 does not survive for consideration and the same stands disposed of.

Sd/-

ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/-

JUDGE LB