Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Delhi High Court - Orders

Chetanya Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. & Ors vs Harpal Singh & Ors on 1 June, 2022

Author: Prateek Jalan

Bench: Prateek Jalan

                          $~4
                          *      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                          +      O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 145/2022

                                 CHETANYA BUILDCON PVT. LTD. & ORS.      ..... Petitioners
                                             Through: Mr. Karan Prakash, Advocate.

                                                              versus

                                 HARPAL SINGH & ORS.                                 ..... Respondents
                                              Through:              Mr. Vivek Kohli, Senior Advocate
                                                                    with Mr. Sunil Tyagi, Mr. Sandeep
                                                                    Bhuraria, Mr. Nalin Talwar, Ms.
                                                                    Prerna Kohli, Mr. Vishnu Anand,
                                                                    Ms. Yeshi Riachhen, MR. Kustubh
                                                                    Singh, Mr. Naman Dutt and Mr.
                                                                    Juvas Rawal, Advocates for R-1 to
                                                                    R-3.

                          CORAM:
                          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

                                                       ORDER

% 01.06.2022

1. Mr. Karan Prakash, learned counsel for the petitioners, states that the reply to the petition has been served upon him only yesterday (31.05.2022). He seeks time to file a rejoinder. He may do so within two weeks from today.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the disputes have arisen between the parties, and the respondents have also invoked the arbitration clause contained in the settlement deed dated 10.09.2020, which is being relied upon by the petitioners.

3. It has been put to Mr. Prakash that, in the event the parties consent Signature Not Verified Digitally signed O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 145/2022 Page 1 of 2 By:SHITU NAGPAL Signing Date:02.06.2022 13:40:49 to reference to arbitration at this stage itself, as both parties have claims and counter claims against each other, interim measures can be sought in arbitration under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. However, he seeks time to file a rejoinder.

4. List on 24.08.2022.

PRATEEK JALAN, J JUNE 1, 2022 'vp'/ Click here to check corrigendum, if any Signature Not Verified Digitally signed O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 145/2022 Page 2 of 2 By:SHITU NAGPAL Signing Date:02.06.2022 13:40:49