Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 4]

Bombay High Court

B. Moosa Hussain Haji vs C. Mohd. Mohiddin Kutty on 9 March, 2022

Author: Sandeep K. Shinde

Bench: Sandeep K. Shinde

                                                                     (20)-CAF-1339-6 & 1930-8 in FA St.-1511-2006.doc
                                                                                                   09.03.2022



                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                             CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                        Civil Application (CAF) No. 1339 / 2006
                                                        Alongwith
                                        Civil Application (CAF) No. 1930 / 2008
                                                            in
                                          First Appeal Stamp No. 1511 / 2006

                            B. Moosa Hussain Haji                                        ... Applicant
                                    Versus
                            C. Mohd. Mohiddin Kutty                                      ... Respondent

                                                             ****
                            None for the Applicant.
                            None for Respondent.
         Digitally signed
                                                             ****
         by
         MOHAMMAD
MOHAMMAD NAJEEB
NAJEEB   MOHAMMAD                                          CORAM        : SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.

MOHAMMAD QAYYUM DATE : 9th MARCH, 2022. QAYYUM Date:

2022.03.09 18:11:13 +0530 P.C. These two applications; one for condonation of delay and another for amendment, are pending for consideration in First Appeal Stamp No. 1511/2006. None appears for the Applicant. Even, on 1 st February, 2022, when applications were called on for hearing, nobody had appeared for the Applicant. Therefore, Applications are dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.) Najeeb 1/1