Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Pr. Commissioner Of vs M/S Rambus Chip Technologies (India) on 8 November, 2017

Author: P.S.Dinesh Kumar

Bench: P.S.Dinesh Kumar

                            -1-
                                        ITA No.55/2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

     DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2017

                        PRESENT

              THE HON'BLE MR.H.G.RAMESH
                 ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

                           AND

     THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR

            INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.55/2016

BETWEEN :

1.      PR. COMMISSIONER OF
        INCOME TAX, CENTRAL REVENUE
        BUILDINGS, QUEENS ROAD
        BANGALORE-560 001

2.      THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF
        INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 12 (4)
        BANGALORE                        ...APPELLANTS

(BY SRI E.I.SANMATHI, ADVOCATE)

AND :

M/S RAMBUS CHIP TECHNOLOGIES (INDIA)
PVT. LTD., (RAMBUS INDIA), 12TH FLOOR
TOWER C & D, IBC KNOWLEDGE PARK
4/1, BANNERGATTA ROAD
BANGALORE                               ...RESPONDENT

(BY SRI T.SURYANARAYANA, ADVOCATE)

     THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION
260-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE
SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW AND TO SET ASIDE THE
ORDER DATED 22/07/2015 PASSED BY THE ITAT, 'B' BENCH
                              -2-
                                              ITA No.55/2016

BENGALURU IN ITA NO.61/BANG/2015 FOR THE ASSESSMENT
YEAR 2009-2010.

     THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION,
THIS DAY, THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:

                          JUDGMENT

Ag.CJ (Oral):

Learned Counsel appearing for the appellants submits that the first and second substantial questions of law formulated in the appeal memorandum do not arise for consideration and the third question raised is answered against the appellants by this Court in CIT v. Tata Elxsi Ltd. [(2012) 349 ITR 98 (Karn)]. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Appeal dismissed.
Sd/-
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/-
JUDGE Yn.