Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 3]

Central Information Commission

Shri.Hari Mohan Bajaj vs Punjab And Sind Bank on 11 October, 2010

                            Central Information Commission
                             File No.CIC/SM/A/2010/000346 
                  Right to Information Act­2005­Under Section  (19)




                                                                   Dated: 11 October 2010

Name of the Appellant  : Shri Hari Mohan Bajaj House No. 1032.

Sector - 43/B, Chandigarh.

Name of the Public Authority   : CPIO, Punjab & Sind Bank, H.O. Risk Management Department, 7th Floor, 21, Bank House, Rajendra Place, New Delhi - 110 125.

The Appellant was present along with Shri M.S. Jandyal. On behalf of the Respondent, Shri Lekh Raj Chugh, Senior Manager  was present.

 

2. We   heard   this   case   through   videoconferencing.   The   Appellant   was  present   in   the   Chandigarh   studio   of   the   NIC   along   with   his   advocate.   The  Respondent was present in our chamber. We heard their submissions.

3. The Appellant had wanted to know a number of details in respect of the  action taken on his complaint. The CPIO had denied the information by claiming  exemption under Section 8(1) (h) of the Right to Information (RTI) Act without  giving   much   detail   of   how   the   disclosure   of   this   information   would   affect  adversely   the   outcome   of   the   investigation   or   prosecution.   The   Appellate  Authority had endorsed the decision of the CPIO, again without giving much  CIC/SM/A/2010/000346 justification. During the hearing, we heard the submissions for both the parties  and   carefully   considered   the   contents   of   the   RTI   application.   Some   of   the  queries of the Appellant are in the nature of seeking opinion and, to that extent,  do not require any response from the CPIO. However, in almost all his queries,  there  are  also  such  elements  for  which  the  bank  can  provide  the  available  information. Since the information sought is largely factual in nature, we cannot  see   how  the   disclosure  of  such   information  would  have  any  impact  on   the  investigation pending in the matter. 

4. Therefore,   we   direct   the   CPIO  to   provide   to   the   Appellant   within   15  working days from the receipt of this order the desired information, wherever  available,  against  each  of   his   queries  along  with   photocopies  of   supporting  documents, if any. Preferably, the information must be provided in a tabular  format. If the information is not available against any of the queries, the CPIO  shall clearly say so against that particular query.

5. With the above direction, the appeal is disposed off.

6. Copies of this order be given free of cost to the parties.

(Satyananda Mishra) Information Commissioner Authenticated true copy.  Additional copies of orders shall be supplied against  application and payment of the charges prescribed under the Act to the CPIO of this  Commission.

(Vijay Bhalla) CIC/SM/A/2010/000346 Assistant Registrar CIC/SM/A/2010/000346