Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 4]

Madras High Court

J.Tamilrajan vs The Director Of School Education on 21 March, 2023

Author: G.R.Swaminathan

Bench: G.R.Swaminathan

                                                                        W.P(MD)No.25353 of 2022


                          BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                            DATED : 21.03.2023

                                                      CORAM

                            THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

                                         W.P(MD)No.25353 of 2022
                                                  and
                                        W.M.P.(MD)No.19438 of 2022

                J.Tamilrajan                                         ... Petitioner

                                                       Vs.

                1.The Director of School Education,
                  College Road,
                  Chennai 600006.

                2.The Joint Director of School,
                  College Road,
                  Chennai 600 006.

                3.The Chief Educational Officer,
                  Thoothukudi,
                  Thoothukudi District.

                4.The District Educational Officer,
                  Thoothukudi,
                  Thoothukudi District.

                5.The Secretary,
                  Karapettai Nadar Higher Secondary School,
                  Thoothukudi,
                  Thoothukudi District 628 001.

                6.The Headmaster,
                  Karapettai Nadar Higher Secondary School,
                  Thoothukudi,

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                1/6
                                                                              W.P(MD)No.25353 of 2022


                   Thoothukudi District 628 001.                            ... Respondents

                Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,

                praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the

                impugned charge memo issued by the fifth respondent herein in his proceedings

                dated 21.10.2022 and to quash the same as illegal and further directing the

                respondents 3 & 4 herein to pass appropriate orders by accepting the petitioner

                voluntary retirement from service of B.T.Assistant Selection Grade Teacher in

                the 5th respondent School and release the petitioner's retirement benefits

                including commuted value of pension, Gratuity, EPF, Surrender leave salary

                and all other monetary benefits etc., within time stipulated by this Court.


                                  For Petitioner   : Mr.V.Meenakshisundaram

                                  For Respondents : Mr.N.Satheeshkumar
                                                    Additional Government Pleader for R1 to R4
                                                  : Mr.Isaac Mohanlal
                                                    Senior Counsel
                                                    for M/s.Isaac Chambers for R5
                                                  : No appearance for R6


                                                      ORDER

The petitioner questions the impugned charge memo dated 21.10.2022 issued by the fifth respondent herein. The petitioner's counsel reiterated all the contentions set out in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition and https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/6 W.P(MD)No.25353 of 2022 called upon this Court to quash the impugned charge memo and grant relief as prayed for.

2. The fifth respondent has filed a detailed counter affidavit and the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the management took me through its contents and pressed for dismissal of the writ petition.

3. The learned Additional Government Pleader submitted that the stand of the department has been made clear and that therefore this Court can pass an appropriate order on that basis.

4. I carefully considered the rival contentions and went through the materials on record.

5. The writ petitioner J.Tamil Rajan joined the fifth respondent school as secondary grade teacher in 1989. He became B.T.Assistant in the year 2010. He was holding the post of selection grade B.T. Assistant. He had completed 33 years of service. He claims to have submitted application for voluntary retirement on 20.04.2022 through proper channel. He claims to have indicated his date of retirement as 19.07.2022. It is further claimed that the school committee accepted his request and also relieved him from service. His contention is that the management lacked the jurisdiction to issue the impugned charge memo thereafter.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/6 W.P(MD)No.25353 of 2022

6. The management contests the version projected by the petitioner. According to them, since a new committee had taken over the administration of the school and the petitioner did not want to serve the new team, he created records as if he submitted a request for voluntary retirement on 20.04.2022. Since the petitioner's tampering of record has been discovered, the management decided to take disciplinary action. Pursuant to the said decision, the impugned charge memo came to be issued.

7. I need not consider which version is right. The petitioner had earlier filed W.P.(MD)No.20685 of 2022 and this Court vide order dated 01.09.2022 had directed the competent authority to pass order on his representation for acceptance of his voluntary retirement and disbursement of retirement benefits. Pursuant to the said direction, the Chief Educational Officer, Thoothukudi issued proceedings bearing Moo.Moo.No.4664/Aa4/2022, dated 04.02.2023 granting approval accepting the petitioner's request to go on voluntary retirement. The management was directed to issue relieving order within seven days. This proceeding was served on the management on 06.02.2023. Till date ie., 21.03.2023, there has been no challenge to the aforesaid order. The learned Additional Government Pleader, on instructions, clarified that the petitioner's papers were received by the department on 05.07.2022 itself. It is true that election for the society took place subsequently and the new committee took https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/6 W.P(MD)No.25353 of 2022 over on 04.08.2022. But even before the said date, the department had received the papers pertaining to the petitioner. The competent authority had also given his approval. In these circumstances, I have to necessarily proceed on the basis of the proceedings dated 04.02.2023 issued by the competent authority in favour of the petitioner. The irresistible conclusion is that the petitioner ceased to be the employee of the fifth respondent school after 19.07.2022. Once the employer-employee relationship stood snapped, the management lost the jurisdiction to issue the impugned charge memo. It stands quashed.

8. The school management / R5 and R6 are directed to issue appropriate relieving order in the light of the proceedings dated 04.02.2023 issued by the competent authority. The learned senior counsel appearing for the management states that such an order will be issued by tomorrow. The management is directed to facilitate the earlier disbursal of the petitioner's retirement benefits.

9. The Writ Petition stands allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.




                                                                       21.03.2023
                Index             : Yes / No
                Internet          : Yes/ No
                rmi




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                5/6
                                                            W.P(MD)No.25353 of 2022


                                                      G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

                                                                               rmi

                To

                1.The Director of School Education,
                  College Road,
                  Chennai 600006.

                2.The Joint Director of School,
                  College Road,
                  Chennai 600 006.

                3.The Chief Educational Officer,
                  Thoothukudi,
                  Thoothukudi District.

                4.The District Educational Officer,
                  Thoothukudi,
                  Thoothukudi District.




                                                      W.P(MD)No.25353 of 2022




                                                                     21.03.2023


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                6/6