Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Mr. Jatinder Singh Kohil vs Mrs. Gurmeet Kaur Jatinder Singh Kohil on 8 June, 2022

Author: Prithviraj K. Chavan

Bench: K.R. Shriram, Prithviraj K. Chavan

          Digitally signed
          by GAURI
GAURI     AMIT                                         1/2                     35.CAM-284-2019.doc
AMIT      GAEKWAD
GAEKWAD   Date:
          2022.06.09
          15:54:36 +0530         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                         CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                        CIVIL APPLICATION NO.284 OF 2019
                                                      WITH
                                     INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1655 OF 2019
                                                      WITH
                                     INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2477 OF 2019
                                                       IN
                                      FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.197 OF 2019
              Jatinderpal Singh Kohli                         ....Applicant
                          V/s.
              Gurmeet Kaur Jatinderpal Singh Kohli  ....Respondent
                                               WITH
                              INTERIM APPLICATION NO.750 OF 2020
                                                 IN
                              FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.147 OF 2019
              Gurmeet Kaur Jatinderpal Singh Kohli            ....Applicant
                          V/s.
              Jatinderpal Singh Kohli                         ....Respondent
                                                 ----
              Mr. Jignesh Shah for appellant in FCA/197/2019.
              None for respondent in FCA/197/2019.
              Mr. J.K. Shah a/w. Mr. Murtuza Bohra i/b. RJ Law for respondent in
              FCA/147/2019 and for appellant in FCA/197/2019.
                                                 ----
                                             CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &
                                                      PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ.

DATED : 8th JUNE 2022 P.C.:

1 As recorded in the order dated 5th March 2020 respondent has sought leave of the Court to argue the matter in person because she has given discharge to her advocate. Respondent also wanted to make appropriate application in the registry for permission to argue in person.

Gauri Gaekwad 2/2 35.CAM-284-2019.doc 2 Respondent is absent today and it is not clear whether such an application before the registry has been filed. 3 Therefore, stand over to 29th June 2022 on which date respondent is directed to remain present in Court. 4 Appellant's advocate to inform respondent about this order. (PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.) Gauri Gaekwad